Each team needs to track different KPIs when it comes to APIs.
The API metrics important to infrastructure teams will be different than what API metrics are important to API product or API platform teams.
Metrics can also be dependent on where the API is in the product lifecycle. A API recently launched will focus more on
improving design and usage while sacrificing reliability and backwards compatibility. An team that maintains an API that's been widely adopted by enterprise teams may
focus more on driving additional feature adoption per account and give precedence to reliability and backwards compatibility over design.
In general, there are three to four teams that care about API metrics
Ensure the servers are running and limited resources are correctly allocated, potentially for multiple engineering teams.
API developers are responsible for adding new features to APIs while debugging application specific issues in the API business logic.
These products could be API as a Service, plugins and integrations for partners, APIs incorporated in a larger product, or something else.
API product managers are in charge of roadmapping API features, ensuring the right API endpoints are being build, and balancing the needs ot customers (whether internal or external) with engineering time and personal constraints.
Business facing teams such as marketing and sales are not thinking in terms of API endpoints, rather they are mostly interested in customer adoption, ensuring they're successfully using the APIs, where they come from, and seeing which users could be new sales opportunities.
Many of these metrics are the focus of Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tools and infrastructure monitoring companies like Datadog.
While one of the most basic metrics, uptime or availability is the gold standard for measuring the availability of a service. Many enterprise agreements include a SLA (Service Level Agreement), and uptime is
usually rolled up into that. Many times, you'll here terms like triple 9's or four 9's which is a measure of how much uptime vs downtime there is per year.
|Availability %||Downtime per year|
|99% ("two nines")||3.65 days|
|99.9% ("three nines")||8.77 hours|
|99.99% ("four nines")||52.60 minutes|
|99.999% ("five nines")||5.26 minutes|
Of course, going from four to five nines is far harder than going from two to three nines which is why you won't see five nines except for the most mission critical
(and expensive) of services. With that said, certain services can actually have lower uptime while ensuring graceful handling of outages without impacting your service.
For example, Moesif is designed such that it can continue to collect data from our SDKs even during a full outage of the website and dashboard.
Even in absolutely worst case where our collection network is down, the SDKs will queue locally and not cause disruption of the application.
Uptime is most commonly measured via a ping service or synthetic testing such as via Pingdom or UptimeRobot. You can configure probes to run on a fixed interval such as
every minute to probe a specific endpoint such as
/status. This endpoint should have basic connectivity tests such as to any backing data stores or other services.
There are also more sophisticated ping services called Synthetic testing that can perform more elaborate test set ups such as running a
specific sequence and asserting the response payload has a certain value. Keep in mind though synthetic teesting may not be representative of real world traffic from your
customers. You can have a buggy API while maintaining high uptime.
What is Synthetic Monitoring?
As name implies, it is a predefined set of API calls that a server (usually by one of the providers of Monitoring services) triggers to call your service. While it doesn't reflect real world experience of your users, it is useful to see the sequence of these APIs are as expected.
CPU usage is one of the most classic performance metrics that can be a proxy to application responsiveness. High Server CPU usage can mean
the server or virtual machine is oversubscribed and overloaded or it can mean a performance bug in your application such as too many spinlocks. Infrastructure engineers
use CPU usage (along with its sister metric, memory percentage) for resource planning and measuring overall health. Certain types of applications like
high bandwidth proxy services and API gateways naturally have higher CPU usage than other metrics along with workloads that involve
heavy floating point math such as video encoding and machine learning workloads.
When your debugging APIs locally, you can easily see system and process CPU usage via Task manager on Windows (or Activity Monitor on Mac) to see CPU usage. On a server though,
you probably don't want to be SSH'ing and running the
top command. This is where various APM providers can be useful. APMs include a agent that you can embed in your application or on the server that capture metrics such as CPU and memory usage. It can also perform other application specific monitoring like thread profiling.
When looking at CPU usage, its important to look at usage per virtual CPU (i.e. physical thread). Unbalanced usage can imply applications not correctly threaded or
and incorrectly sized thread pool.
Many APM providers enable you to tag an application with multiple names so you can perform rollups. For example, you may want to have a breakout of each VM metrics
like my-api-westus-vm0, my-api-westus-vm1, my-api-eastus-vm0, etc while having these rolled up in a single app called my-api.
Like CPU usage, memory usage is also a good proxy for measuring resource utilization as CPU and memory capacity are physical resources unlike a metric which may be more configuration dependent. A VM with extremely low memory usage can be either be downsized or have additional services allocated to that VM to consume additional memory. On the flip side, high memory usage can be an indicator of servers overloaded. Traditionally, big data queries/stream processing and production databases consume
much more memory than CPU. In fact, the size of memory per VM is a good indicator for how long your batch query can take as more memory available can reduce check pointing, network synchronization, and paging to disk. When looking at memory usage, you should also look at number of page faults and I/O ops. An easy mistake to make is an application
that's configured to allocate at a maximum only a small fraction of available physical memory which can cause artificially high page virtual memory thrashing.
RPM (Requests per Minute) is a performance metric often used when comparing HTTP or database servers.
Usually, you're end to end RPM will be much lower than an advertised RPM, which serves more as an upper bound for a simple "Hello World" API.
Since a server will not consider latency incurred for I/O operations to databases, 3rd party services, etc. While some like to brag about their high
RPM, an engineering team's goal should be efficiency and attempt to drive this down. Certain business functions that require many API calls can be combined into
fewer number of API calls to reduce this number. Common patterns like batching multiple requests in a single request can be very useful along with ensuring
you have a flexible pagination scheme.
Your RPM may vary depending on day of week or even hour per days especially if your API is geared for other businesses which exhibit lower usage during nights and
weekends. There are other related terms to RPM such as RPS (Requests per Second) and QPS (Queries per Second).
One of the most important metrics to track customer experience is API latency or elapsed time. While an increase in infrastructure level metrics like CPU usage may not actually correspond to a drop in user perceived responsiveness, API latency definitely will. Tracking latency by itself may not give you full understanding to why
an increase occurred. It's important to track any change on your API such as new API versions being released, new endpoints added, schema changes, and more to
get to a root cause why latency increased.
Because problematic slow endpoints may be hidden when looking only at aggregate latency, it's critical to look at breakdowns of latency by route, by geography, and other
fields to segment on. For example, you may have a
POST /checkout endpoint that's slowly been increasing in latency over time which could be due to an ever-increasing
SQL table size that's not correctly indexed. However, due to a low volume of calls to
POST /checkout, this issue is masked by your
GET /items endpoint which is called far more than the checkout endpoint. Similarly, if you have a GraphQL API, you'll want to look at the average latency per GraphQL operation.
We put latency under application/engineering even though many DevOps/Infrastructure teams will also look at latency. Usually an infrastructure person looks at
aggregate latency over a set of VMs to make sure the VMs are not overloaded, but they don't drill down into application specific metrics like per route.
Similar to RPM, Errors per Minute (or error rate) is the number of API calls with non 200 family of status codes per minute and is critical for measuring how buggy and error-prone your API is. In order to track errors per minute,
it's important to understand what type of errors are happening. 500 errors could imply bad things are happening with your code where as many 400 errors could
imply user errors from a poorly designed or documented API. This means when designing your API, it's important to use the appropriate HTTP status code.
You can further drill down into seeing where these errors come from. Many 401 Unauthorized errors from one specific geo region could imply bots are
attempting to hack your API.
APIs are no longer just an engineering term associated with microservices and SOA. APIs as a product is becoming far more common especially among B2B companies
who want to one up their competition with new partners and revenue channels. API-driven companies need to look at more than just engineering metrics like
errors and latency to understand how their APIs are used (or why they are not being adopted as fast as planned). The role of ensuring the right features are built
lies on the API product manager, a new role that many B2B companies are rushing to fill.
What is Moesif? Moesif is the most advanced API analytics platform used by over 2000 organizations to understand what your most loyal customers are doing with your APIs, how they're accessing them, and from where. Moesif focuses on analyzing real customer data vs just synthetic tests to ensure you're building the
best possible API platform for your customers.
For many product managers, API usage (along with unique consumers) is the gold standard to measure API adoption. An API should not be just error free, but growing month over month. Unlike requests per minute, API usage should be measured in longer intervals like days or months to understand real trends. If measuring month-over-month API growth, we recommend choosing 28-days instead as it removes any bias due to weekend vs weekday usage and also differences in number of days per month. For example, February may have only 28 days whereas the month before has a full 31 days causing February to appear to have lower usage.
Because a month's increase in API usage may be attributed to just a single customer account, it's important to measure API DAU (Monthly Active Users) or unique consumers of an API. This metric can give you an overall health of new customer acquisition and growth. Many API platform teams correlate API MAU to their web MAU, to get a full product health. If web MAU is growing far faster than API MAU, then this could imply a leaky funnel during integration or implementation of a new solution. This is especially true when the core product of the company is an API such as for many B2B/SaaS companies.
On the other hand, API MAU can be correlated to API usage to understand where that increased API usage came from (New vs. existing customers).
Tools like Moesif can track both individual users calling and API and also link them to companies or organizations.
For any company with a focus on B2B, tracking the top API consumers can give you a huge advantage when it comes to understanding how your API is used and where
upsell opportunities exist. Many experienced product leaders know that many products exhibit power law dynamics with a handful of power users having a disproportionate
amount of usage compared to everyone else. Not surprisingly, these are the same power users that generally bring your company the most revenue and organic referrals.
This means its critical to track what your top 10 customers are actually doing with your API. You can further break this down by what endpoints they are calling and how
they're calling them. Do they use a specific endpoint much more than your non-power users? Maybe they found their ah ha moment with your API.
Should you spend more money on your product and engineering or put more money into growth? Retention and churn (the opposite of retention) can tell you which path to take.
A product with high product retention is closer to product market fit than a product with a churn issue. Unlike subscription retention, product retention tracks the actual usage of a product such as an API. While the two are correlated, they are not the same. In general, product churn is a leading indicator of subscription churn since customers
who don't find value in an API may be stuck with a yearly contract while not actively using the API. API retention should be higher than web retention as web retention will
include customers who logged in, but didn't necessarily integrate the platform yet. Whereas API retention looks at post-integrated customers.
TTFHW is an important KPI for not just tracking your API product health, but your overall developer experience aka DX. Especially if your API is an open platform attracting 3rd party developers and partners, you want to ensure they are able to get up and
running as soon as possible to their first ah ha moment. TTFHW measures how long it takes from first vist to your landing page to an MVP integration that makes the first
transaction through your API platform. This is a cross-functional metric tracking marketing, documentation and tutorials, to the API itself.
While more equals better for many product and business metrics, its important to keep the number of calls per business transactions as low as possible.
This metric directly reflects the design of the API. If a new customer has to make 3 different calls and piece the data together, this can mean the API
does not have the correct endpoints available. When designing an API, it's important to think in terms of a business transaction or what the customer is trying to achieve
rather than just features and endpoints. It may also mean your API is not flexible enough when it comes to filtering and pagination..
Many API platform teams may also have a bunch of SDKs and integrations they maintain. Unlike mobile where you just have iOS and Android as the core mobile operating systems,
you may have 10's or even hundreds of SDKs. This can become a maintenance nightmare when rolling out new features. You may selectively roll out critical features to your
most popular SDKs whereas less critical features may be rolled out to less popular SDKs. Measuring API or SDK version is also important when it comes to deprecating certain
endpoints and features. You wouldn't want to deprecate the endpoint that your highest paying customer is using without some consultation on why they are using it.
Business/growth metrics can be similar to product metrics but focused on revenue, adoption, and customer success.
For example, instead of looking at the top 10 customers by API usage, you may want to look at top 10 customers by revenue, then by their endpoint usage.
For tracking business growth, analytics tools like Moesif, support enriching user profiles with customer data from your CRM or other analytics services to
have a better idea who your API users are.
For anyone building and working with APIs, its critical to track the correct API metrics. Most companies would not launch a new web or mobile product without having the correct instrumentation for engineering and product. Similarly, you wouldn't want to launch a new API without a way to instrument and track the correct API metrics. Sometimes the KPIs for one team can blend into another team as we saw with the API usage metrics. There can be different ways of looking at the same underlying metric. However, teams should stay focused on looking at the right metrics for their team. For example, product managers shouldn't worry about CPU usage just like infrastructure teams shouldn't worry about API retention. Tools like Moesif API Analytics can help you get started measuring these metrics with just a quick SDK installation.
Most people want to make things perfect. Sometimes we evaluate the complexity of an upcoming goal or a problem. So, the fear to not complete it perfectly or "wrong" (Yeah, who are judges? 🤔) stops us even from trying.