Mastering Email Flow Validation in Go Without Documentation

Ensuring Reliable Email Flow Validation with Go: A Practical Approach

Validating email flows is a critical task for ensuring that email notification systems are functioning properly. As a Lead QA Engineer, faced with the challenge of verifying email delivery, routing, and formatting—yet hindered by the absence of proper documentation—I adopted a pragmatic, code-first approach using Go. This blog shares the insights, strategies, and code snippets that helped me establish a reliable validation process.

The Challenge: Uncharted Territory in Email Validation

Without detailed documentation, understanding email flows becomes a matter of reverse engineering and iterative testing. Common issues include bounced emails, delivery failures, incorrect formatting, and delays. Manual testing is time-consuming and error-prone, especially at scale.

The goal was to create a robust, automated validation framework that could simulate email flows, verify delivery, and check content correctness systematically.

Approach: Building from Scratch with Go

Go’s simplicity, performance, and rich standard library made it an excellent choice for this task. Here's the step-by-step approach:

1. Establishing SMTP Connections

First, I established SMTP connection handling to send test emails. This allows me to simulate the email flow from source to destination.

package main

import (
    "net/smtp"
    "log"
)

func sendTestEmail(to string, subject string, body string) error {
    auth := smtp.PlainAuth("", "[e-mail]", "your_password", "smtp.example.com")
    msg := []byte("From: [e-mail]\r\n" +
        "To: " + to + "\r\n" +
        "Subject: " + subject + "\r\n" +
        "\r\n" +
        body)
    return smtp.SendMail("smtp.example.com:587", auth, "[e-mail]", []string{to}, msg)
}

func main() {
    err := sendTestEmail("[e-mail]", "Validation Test", "This is a test email.")
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    log.Println("Email sent successfully")
}

2. Monitoring Delivery and Responses

To verify delivery, I integrated with bounce email handlers and logs. For example, setting up a dedicated inbox or API endpoint to fetch bounce messages and verify delivery status.

// Pseudocode for fetching bounce emails
func fetchBounceEmails() ([]BounceMessage, error) {
    // Connect to bounce email server (IMAP/POP3)
    // Fetch unread bounce messages
    // Parse and extract relevant info
    // return list of bounce messages
}

3. Content Validation

Content correctness is key. Using Go’s built-in HTML parser, I checked whether the email content matches expectations.

import "golang.org/x/net/html"

func validateEmailContent(emailHTML string, expectedContent string) bool {
    doc, err := html.Parse(strings.NewReader(emailHTML))
    if err != nil {
        return false
    }
    var contains bool
    var f func(*html.Node)
    f = func(n *html.Node) {
        if n.Type == html.TextNode && strings.Contains(n.Data, expectedContent) {
            contains = true
        }
        for c := n.FirstChild; c != nil; c = c.NextSibling {
            f(c)
        }
    }
    f(doc)
    return contains
}

4. Automating the Validation Pipeline

Using Go routines and integration tests, I automated repeated execution of email validation, including sending, monitoring bounce responses, and content verification.

func runValidationWorkflow() {
    // send email
    // monitor delivery
    // fetch bounces
    // verify content
    // log results
}

Lessons Learned

• Iterative testing helped uncover edge cases.
• Logging and error handling were crucial, especially without documentation.
• Decoupling components allowed reusing code segments for different parts of validation.
• Documentation through code became the source of truth.

Final Thoughts

While challenging, validating email flows without proper documentation is manageable with a strategic, code-driven approach. By leveraging Go’s capabilities, I built a scalable, reliable validation toolkit that not only addresses the current challenge but also serves as a foundation for future testing efforts. The key is to treat email validation as a systematic process—breaking it down into sending, monitoring, and content verification—and automating each step for continuous assurance.

Through this example, I hope to inspire fellow QA engineers to adopt a proactive, self-documenting style of validation that adapts to fast-paced, documentation-deficient environments.

---

Tags: email, go, testing

---

🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.