DEV Community

Mohammad Waseem
Mohammad Waseem

Posted on

Overcoming Geo-Blocked Feature Testing with Docker: A Lead QA Engineer’s Approach

Overcoming Geo-Blocked Feature Testing with Docker: A Lead QA Engineer’s Approach

Testing geo-restricted features can pose significant challenges, especially when dealing with unpredictable restrictions and lacking comprehensive documentation. As a Lead QA Engineer, I faced this issue firsthand while trying to validate features that depend on user location, without pre-existing scripts or setup guides. This post details how I used Docker to create an adaptable local testing environment, enabling reliable simulation of geo-restrictions.

The Challenge

Many applications restrict access or tailor content based on the user's geographical location. Testing such features in a traditional setup is difficult because:

  • The environment depends on real-world IP geolocation service responses.
  • Cloud-based environment configurations are complex.
  • There's limited documentation on the existing setup, making fast replication difficult.

The goal was to find a solution that allows consistent, repeatable testing of geo-restricted features locally, without relying on external IP or VPNs, which are unreliable and slow.

Solution Overview

Docker emerged as the ideal platform because of its ability to containerize networking and environment configurations. I crafted a Docker-based solution that allows us to

  • Simulate different geographical locations reliably.
  • Isolate testing environments.
  • Maintain consistency across CI/CD pipelines.

Implementation Steps

1. Building a Custom Docker Image for Geo-Location Simulation

The core idea is to reroute or modify geolocation API responses within the container. For this, I used a simple nginx proxy that intercepts requests to geolocation services and inspects or modifies response data.

Dockerfile

FROM nginx:alpine
COPY geo-mock.conf /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf

EXPOSE 80
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

2. Configuring the Proxy (geo-mock.conf)

The configuration mimics geolocation API responses, allowing us to set fixed location data.

server {
    listen 80;
    server_name localhost;

    location /geolocation-api {
        default_type application/json;
        return 200 '{"country":"US","region":"CA","city":"San Francisco"}';
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This setup intercepts calls to the /geolocation-api endpoint, returning preset location data.

3. Running the Container

docker build -t geo-mock .
docker run -d -p 8080:80 --name geo-mock-container geo-mock
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

4. Configuring the Application to Use the Local Geolocation Proxy

Modify your application's geolocation API URL to point to http://localhost:8080/geolocation-api. This reroutes all location queries through your container, enabling location simulation.

5. Enhancing the Setup for Multiple Locations

To test different regions, modify the geo-mock.conf on the fly or create multiple configuration files, each with different location data, and run them in separate containers. For example, one for Europe:

{"country":"FR","region":"IDF","city":"Paris"}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Benefits and Best Practices

  • Repeatability: Docker containers ensure that every test is run under identical conditions.
  • Isolation: No interference from host network or VPN, leading to more accurate results.
  • Scalability: Easily incorporate into CI pipelines using Docker images.
  • Documentation Tip: Even though initial instructions were scarce, the iterative development of this setup reinforced the importance of thorough documentation for future scalability.

Closing Notes

By leveraging Docker containers as geo-location proxies, I enabled our QA team to simulate diverse geographical conditions effectively. This approach reduces reliance on external services, increases test consistency, and accelerates our testing cycle. For teams facing similar challenges, consider containerizing your environment configurations, especially when working with location-dependent features.

Feel free to adapt and extend this setup for more complex scenarios involving multiple layers of network simulation or integrating real IP geolocation APIs with mock responses for extensive testing.


🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.

Top comments (0)