LangChain surveyed 1,340 engineers for its State of Agent Engineering report on June 12, 2026. 57% of them have AI agents running in production, and at companies above 10,000 employees it is 67%. Agents stopped being weekend demos somewhere in the last twelve months.
The tooling moved with them. LangGraph cut 1.0. OpenAI retired Swarm and shipped a real SDK. Google's ADK went 1.0 in four languages. A TypeScript-first framework closed a $22M round. All of which makes the obvious question harder, not easier: which one do you actually build on?
I wrote a much longer breakdown of all eleven frameworks on DevToolLab - the full guide is here. This is the condensed version.
What You Get Beyond the Loop
An agent is a loop. The model asks for a tool, you run it, you hand back the result, repeat until done. That is roughly 40 lines of code and you do not need a dependency for it.
What you pay a framework for is the unglamorous ring around the loop: tool schemas that validate before the model's arguments reach your function, state that checkpoints so a two-hour job survives a restart, orchestration when one agent becomes five, guardrails on both ends of the exchange, and traces you can actually read at 2am. That last one is not optional in practice - 94% of the teams running production agents in that survey had observability wired in.
Protocols Ate the Lock-In Problem
The most useful thing to understand about 2026 is that your framework choice got cheaper to get wrong.
Two standards did that. MCP normalizes how an agent reaches tools and data. A2A normalizes how agents talk to each other across vendors. A2A landed at the Linux Foundation with a stable v1.0 and 150+ backing organizations as of April 2026, and MCP now ships natively in OpenAI's SDK, Google ADK, Microsoft's framework, LangGraph, Strands and Mastra.
So the expensive part of your system - the tool integrations - lives outside the SDK. Optimize for your team's language and developer experience, not for whichever framework you think wins. If MCP is new to you, start with the MCP servers roundup or the Python MCP server walkthrough.
The Python Options
LangGraph treats your agent as a graph over a checkpointed state object. Maximum control, and you spell out every edge: where it branches, where it waits for a human, how it resumes. It hit 1.0 on October 22, 2025, two days after LangChain raised $125M at a $1.25B valuation. Overkill for three steps. Worth the verbosity once flows get conditional and long-running.
CrewAI goes the other direction - describe agents as roles with goals and let them work as a crew. Fastest route to a readable multi-agent prototype, and despite the persistent rumor it does not depend on LangChain. The abstraction that makes it quick is also what you fight when logic gets genuinely branchy.
Pydantic AI points the validation library half of Python already imports at LLM output. Declare a model, get conforming data or an exception - not hopeful parsing. Past 1.0, works across 20+ providers. Multi-agent orchestration is younger than the graph frameworks.
Agno (the old Phidata, renamed January 31, 2025) optimizes for speed and ships AgentOS, a FastAPI runtime, so deployment is not a separate project. smolagents from Hugging Face is about a thousand lines and bets on one idea: let the model write Python instead of emitting JSON tool calls. More expressive for plenty of tasks, and it demands a real sandbox. LlamaIndex remains the pick when the job is mostly retrieval over your own data - the connector library is the reason.
The Vendor SDKs
Four large companies now ship agent SDKs, and each one integrates best with its own cloud.
OpenAI Agents SDK replaced Swarm, which is deprecated - do not start there. The primitives are small and legible: Agents, Handoffs, Guardrails, Sessions, Tracing. MCP support is native, Python and TypeScript both ship. It reaches 100+ models through LiteLLM so it is not strictly OpenAI-only, but it is described as production-ready without a formal 1.0, so pin your version.
Google ADK went GA across Python, Go, Java and TypeScript around Cloud Next in April 2026, and is A2A-native out of the box. AWS Strands is at 1.0 with multi-agent primitives and A2A, and Amazon runs it internally behind Amazon Q Developer.
Microsoft Agent Framework needs untangling, because Microsoft shipped three overlapping things. This is the unified successor to both AutoGen and Semantic Kernel, combining AutoGen's multi-agent model with Semantic Kernel's enterprise plumbing. Public preview since October 1, 2025, on .NET, Python and Go. The part that matters: AutoGen and Semantic Kernel are both in maintenance mode now - security and bug fixes only. Most tutorials you will find still point at Semantic Kernel. Ignore them for new work.
TypeScript Finally Counts
Python still has more examples, but 2026 is when TS stopped being the compromise. Every major framework above ships a TypeScript path.
Mastra is the standalone leader - agents, workflows, RAG and evals in one toolkit, from the team that built Gatsby. $22M Series A led by Spark Capital on April 9, 2026, $35M total, 1.0 in January. The Vercel AI SDK is the other pillar, less a full framework than the default toolkit for LLM apps in JS, now with agent primitives, tool approval and MCP. If your product is already Next.js, that is the shortest path.
You will still occasionally hit a library that only exists in Python. That is the real cost, and it is smaller than it was a year ago.
Choosing, Top Down
- Team language. TypeScript means Mastra or the Vercel AI SDK. Skip the guilt about Python having more tutorials.
- Cloud or model commitment. Azure means Microsoft Agent Framework, GCP means ADK, Bedrock means Strands, OpenAI models mean the Agents SDK.
- Mostly retrieval? LlamaIndex.
- Validated outputs above all? Pydantic AI.
- Long, conditional flows with approval gates? LangGraph, and budget for the curve.
- Prototype today? CrewAI, or Agno if you want the runtime included.
Build against MCP for tools and A2A between agents either way. That is what keeps the costly parts portable when you change your mind.
What Validated Output Looks Like
The single most common production requirement is getting reliable structured data out of a model. Pydantic AI makes that a type declaration rather than a parsing problem:
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_ai import Agent
class Weather(BaseModel):
city: str
temperature_c: float
conditions: str
agent = Agent(
"openai:gpt-5",
output_type=Weather,
system_prompt="Extract the weather details the user mentions.",
)
result = agent.run_sync("It's 22 degrees and sunny in Lisbon today.")
print(result.output)
# city='Lisbon' temperature_c=22.0 conditions='sunny'
output_type=Weather is the whole trick. You get a typed object or a validation error you can catch, never a half-parsed string. Every serious framework has a version of this now.
Useful While Building
A few browser tools I keep open when wiring agents up:
- JSON to Pydantic - turn an example payload into the model that becomes your agent's output contract.
- AI Token Counter - check context usage before a loop quietly burns its budget.
- MCP Server Config Generator - produce a valid MCP config without hand-writing JSON.
Wrapping Up
There is no best agent framework in 2026, and because of MCP and A2A there does not need to be one. Match the framework to your language and your cloud, avoid anything in maintenance mode (Swarm, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel), and spend the time you save on tools, guardrails and traces - the parts no framework hands you.
Versions, funding and licenses here reflect July 2026 and move quickly. Check each repo before you commit, and pin your dependencies.
References
- Best AI Agent Frameworks in 2026: Python & TypeScript Compared - the full guide on DevToolLab, with all eleven frameworks and a comparison table
- LangChain: State of Agent Engineering
- Linux Foundation: A2A protocol surpasses 150 organizations
- LangGraph · CrewAI · Pydantic AI · Mastra · OpenAI Agents SDK · Google ADK · AWS Strands · Microsoft Agent Framework



Top comments (0)