I spent one weekend, about six hours, building a small project almost entirely by talking to an AI agent. Barely any typing. No tutorials open. By Sunday night I had something that worked, and I honestly wasn't sure how I felt about it.
People call this "vibe coding." You describe what you want, the AI writes and runs the code, and you steer instead of type. I wanted to know if it was real or just hype, so I tried it on actual work instead of a toy demo.
Here is what it was like.
What vibe coding actually means
The idea is simple. You stop writing every line yourself. You tell an AI agent the outcome you want, and it writes the code, runs it, reads the errors, and fixes its own mistakes while you watch.
My old process for a small script looked like this: open the editor, half-remember the syntax, open four Stack Overflow tabs, forget which library I used last time. A task like that used to eat about two hours of my evening.
With an agent, I described the same script in two sentences and had a working version in under ten minutes. That gap is the whole reason people are excited.
The first hour feels unreal
I'll be honest, it's a little addictive. You ask for something and it exists a few seconds later. No boilerplate. No setup rabbit holes.
The loop is so fast that it changes what you're willing to try. I tested three different approaches to one problem in the time it usually takes me to set up one. When trying an idea is cheap, you try more ideas. That part genuinely changed how I work.
Then reality shows up
The hype posts skip this part, so I won't.
The AI is only as clear as you are. When I was vague, I got vague code. "Make it better" got me nothing useful. "Add a retry that backs off and stops after 30 seconds" got me exactly that. Lazy thinking produced lazy results, and that was on me.
It's also confidently wrong sometimes. Once it handed me clean, professional-looking code that ran fine and did the wrong thing. I only caught it because I read all 40 or so lines before saving. If I couldn't read the code, I would have shipped a bug and felt good about it.
You can also lose the plot. In one session the agent made about a dozen changes in a few minutes. I caught myself nodding along without understanding my own project. I had to stop and actually read what changed.
What made it click
The shift for me was thinking of myself as the director, not the typist.
I decide what to build and why. The AI handles a lot of the how. I still own the review and the judgment call when something looks off. As someone who works in cloud and automation, this felt familiar. It's close to writing a CI pipeline or a Terraform file: you declare what you want, and something else does the repetitive work.
Does it make you a worse engineer?
I was worried it would. After a week of using it, my honest answer is: only if you let it think for you.
Used well, it took the boring parts off my plate and left me more energy for the decisions that actually matter. Used lazily, it's a fast way to ship code you don't understand. That's a choice, not a side effect.
My take
Vibe coding isn't magic, and it isn't the end of programming. It's a power tool. In careful hands it's great. In careless hands it will cost you later. Same as most tools we've picked up over the years.
I'm keeping it in my workflow. I'm just staying the one making the calls.
Have you tried building something this way yet? I'd like to hear whether it felt like a superpower or a headache, so tell me in the comments. I'm new here and writing about everything I learn in cloud, AI, and automation, so a follow means a lot.
Top comments (0)