DEV Community

Cover image for The Real Cost of Kubernetes (And How to Reduce It)
Nisarth Patel
Nisarth Patel

Posted on

The Real Cost of Kubernetes (And How to Reduce It)

Kubernetes is ubiquitous. It has become the backbone of cloud-native modern infrastructure — so much so, you will find it in startups, and in Fortune 500 behemoths. Kubernetes offers scalability, reliability and flexibility, but it also brings a hidden cost.

In an effort to improve the quality of their service and be “cloud-native,” many teams start using Kubernetes and discover that the actual costs are more than just cloud bills — they also include infrastructure overhead, developer productivity, maintenance, and even organization costs.

Let’s know what Kubernetes actually costs, where teams hemorrhage costs (and time), and most importantly how you can reduce costs without giving up the power of Kubernetes.

The Unseen Expenses of Kubernetes

When discussing “Kubernetes costs” most individuals consider only their cloud provider bill to be the indication of total spending. In truth things are not that simple. The costs arise in multi-variate forms:

1. Infrastructure Costs

When an organization runs Kubernetes clusters that means running control planes, worker nodes, and associated infrastructure (e.g. load balancers, storage volumes, and networking).

Costs of the Control Plane: Even managed services such as EKS (AWS), GKE (Google Cloud), or AKS (Azure) charge a premium for management of a cluster.

Inefficient use of Resources: If a workload is not tuninely used resources can be provisioned based on excess CPU and memory and you pay for the for unutilized items.

👉 Example: A team provisions nodes for peak traffic but it does not scale down at night and they are charged for excess capacity that is not used.

2. Operational Complexity

Kubernetes is very powerful but also complex. Running clusters requires deep expertise in:

  • Networking (CNI plugins, service meshes)
  • Managing storage (Persistent Volumes, CSI drivers)
  • Security (RBAC, PodSecurityPolicies, secrets management)
  • Observability (logging, monitoring, tracing)

Without experienced engineers, mistakes pile up, resulting in outages, inefficiency, and hidden costs.

3. Costs Associated with Developer Productivity

Kubernetes comes with a high learning curve. Many developers are spending hours taking YAML configs, Helm charts, and deploying applications instead of focusing on writing features.

Every time a developer has to type kubectl describe pod instead of working on product logic somewhere, that is a loss of productivity.

Continuous integration and continuous deployment pipelines simply become more complicated.

In general, debugging is simply slower than simpler environments.

4. Costs Associated with Maintenance and Talent

  • Maintenance overhead: Keeping your clusters patched, upgrading versions, rotating certificates, etc.
  • Talent costs: Kubernetes engineers are extremely desirable but very expensive.

If you do not have a proper platform team, now this is something that developers must deal with, and it will slow down your product delivery.

The Costs: The Numbers Add Up

Let's be more concrete.

Assuming you have a 3-node cluster running in AWS EKS:

  • EKS Control Plane: $74/month
  • 3 x m5.large worker nodes: ~ $210/month
  • Load balancer, storage and networking overhead: ~ $120/month
  • Monitoring/observability tools: ~ $200/month
  • Engineering hours: easily thousands of dollars in devops salaries

Before even scaling up traffic, we are at $600 per month. Now multiply this across staging, dev, and multiple dev environments... you should see how this solution can add up pretty quickly.

Kubernetes itself is not the issue, the mismanagement + hidden complexities increase the costs quickly.

How to Save Money on Kubernetes

Alright, enough doom and gloom. Kubernetes doesn't have to be a money pit. Here are some strategies to make it more efficient:

1. Right-size Your Nodes and Pods

  • Over-provisioning is the number one enemy.
  • Use resource requests & limits responsively to not waste CPU/memory.
  • If you want automatic resource adjustments, use Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA).
  • Select smaller instance types and scale horizontally instead of one huge machine.
# Example: setting CPU/memory limits
resources:
  requests:
    memory: "256Mi"
    cpu: "250m"
  limits:
    memory: "512Mi"
    cpu: "500m"

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

2. Utilize Autoscaling

Autoscaling can save you thousands of dollars by scaling up during peak load and scaling down during quiet hours.

  • Cluster Autoscaler: scales the number of worker nodes in response to your workload.
  • Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA): automatically scales pods based on CPU/memory threshold.
# Example: Horizontal Pod Autoscaler
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
  name: web-app-hpa
spec:
  scaleTargetRef:
    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    name: web-app
  minReplicas: 2
  maxReplicas: 10
  metrics:
  - type: Resource
    resource:
      name: cpu
      target:
        type: Utilization
        averageUtilization: 70

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

3. Optimize Cluster Footprint

  • Leverage managed Kubernetes solutions - (EKS, GKE, AKS) versus self-hosted options; the operational and support savings are enormous.
  • Remove unnecessary namespaces, unnecessary resources, and dangling load balancers.
  • Use multiple environments (dev, staging) on the same cluster with namespaces versus entirely separate clusters.

4. Use Spot/Preemptible Instances

If your workloads are fault tolerant, you can save 70-90% on costs using spot instances. Combine it with node pools for critical vs. non-critical workloads.

5. Increase Observability

  • You can't reduce what you can’t measure.
  • Monitor utilization through tools like Prometheus, Grafana, or Datadog.
  • Regularly check for unused resources.
  • Review spend reports from your cloud provider.

6. Focus on the Developer Experience

  • Often the greatest cost is not the cost of infrastructure itself, but wasted developer time.
  • Utilize Helm charts or operators to provide a standard way to deploy software.
  • Use internal developer platforms (IDPs) to abstract complexity.
  • Use clear documentation & templates to avoid causing developers to reinvent the wheel.

Kubernetes: Worth the Investment, If You Do It Right

Kubernetes is not free. Even if the software is open-source, the real costs are hidden in infrastructure, complexity, and people.

But there are simple strategies to minimize costs and complexity: autoscaling, right-sizing, spot instances, and investing in developer productivity to get products to market faster.

Point is don't start using K8s just because its popular - start using K8s because the scaling needs of your application demand it and manage it intelligently to avoid steep costs.

💡 If this post has helped you view Kubernetes costs differently - share it with others and leave a comment - the more ideas the better!

Top comments (0)