This is a Creational Design Pattern under Gang of Four
Also known as
Kit
Intent
Provide an interface for creating families of related or dependent
objects without specifying their concrete classes.
Explanation
Real world example
To create a kingdom we need objects with a common theme. Elven kingdom needs an Elven king, Elven castle and Elven army whereas Orcish kingdom needs an Orcish king, Orcish castle and Orcish army. There is a dependency between the objects in the kingdom.
In plain words
A factory of factories; a factory that groups the individual but related/dependent factories together without specifying their concrete classes.
Wikipedia says
The abstract factory pattern provides a way to encapsulate a group of individual factories that have a common theme without specifying their concrete classes
Programmatic Example
Translating the kingdom example above. First of all we have some interfaces and implementation for the objects in the
kingdom.
public interface Castle {
String getDescription();
}
public interface King {
String getDescription();
}
public interface Army {
String getDescription();
}
// Elven implementations ->
public class ElfCastle implements Castle {
static final String DESCRIPTION = "This is the Elven castle!";
@Override
public String getDescription() {
return DESCRIPTION;
}
}
public class ElfKing implements King {
static final String DESCRIPTION = "This is the Elven king!";
@Override
public String getDescription() {
return DESCRIPTION;
}
}
public class ElfArmy implements Army {
static final String DESCRIPTION = "This is the Elven Army!";
@Override
public String getDescription() {
return DESCRIPTION;
}
}
// Orcish implementations similarly -> ...
Then we have the abstraction and implementations for the kingdom factory
public interface KingdomFactory {
Castle createCastle();
King createKing();
Army createArmy();
}
public class ElfKingdomFactory implements KingdomFactory {
public Castle createCastle() {
return new ElfCastle();
}
public King createKing() {
return new ElfKing();
}
public Army createArmy() {
return new ElfArmy();
}
}
public class OrcKingdomFactory implements KingdomFactory {
public Castle createCastle() {
return new OrcCastle();
}
public King createKing() {
return new OrcKing();
}
public Army createArmy() {
return new OrcArmy();
}
}
Now we have our abstract factory that lets us make family of related objects i.e. Elven kingdom factory creates Elven castle, king and army etc.
var factory = new ElfKingdomFactory();
var castle = factory.createCastle();
var king = factory.createKing();
var army = factory.createArmy();
castle.getDescription();
king.getDescription();
army.getDescription();
Program output:
This is the Elven castle!
This is the Elven king!
This is the Elven Army!
Now, we can design a factory for our different kingdom factories. In this example, we created FactoryMaker, responsible for returning an instance of either ElfKingdomFactory or OrcKingdomFactory.
The client can use FactoryMaker to create the desired concrete factory which, in turn, will produce different concrete objects (Army, King, Castle).
In this example, we also used an enum to parameterize which type of kingdom factory the client will ask for.
public static class FactoryMaker {
public enum KingdomType {
ELF, ORC
}
public static KingdomFactory makeFactory(KingdomType type) {
switch (type) {
case ELF:
return new ElfKingdomFactory();
case ORC:
return new OrcKingdomFactory();
default:
throw new IllegalArgumentException("KingdomType not supported.");
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
var app = new App();
LOGGER.info("Elf Kingdom");
app.createKingdom(FactoryMaker.makeFactory(KingdomType.ELF));
LOGGER.info(app.getArmy().getDescription());
LOGGER.info(app.getCastle().getDescription());
LOGGER.info(app.getKing().getDescription());
LOGGER.info("Orc Kingdom");
app.createKingdom(FactoryMaker.makeFactory(KingdomType.ORC));
-- similar use of the orc factory
}
Class diagram
Applicability
Use the Abstract Factory pattern when
- The system should be independent of how its products are created, composed and represented
- The system should be configured with one of multiple families of products
- The family of related product objects is designed to be used together, and you need to enforce this constraint
- You want to provide a class library of products, and you want to reveal just their interfaces, not their implementations
- The lifetime of the dependency is conceptually shorter than the lifetime of the consumer.
- You need a run-time value to construct a particular dependency
- You want to decide which product to call from a family at runtime.
- You need to supply one or more parameters only known at run-time before you can resolve a dependency.
- When you need consistency among products
- You don’t want to change existing code when adding new products or families of products to the program.
Example use cases
- Selecting to call to the appropriate implementation of FileSystemAcmeService or DatabaseAcmeService or NetworkAcmeService at runtime.
- Unit test case writing becomes much easier
- UI tools for different OS
Consequences:
- Dependency injection in java hides the service class dependencies that can lead to runtime errors that would have been caught at compile time.
- While the pattern is great when creating predefined objects, adding the new ones might be challenging.
- The code becomes more complicated than it should be, since a lot of new interfaces and classes are introduced along with the pattern.
Tutorial
Known uses
- javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory
- javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory
- javax.xml.xpath.XPathFactory
Related patterns
Credits
- Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software
- Head First Design Patterns: A Brain-Friendly Guide
Code can be found here
Find out about more design patterns from here
Credit to Original Authors of this post:
Top comments (0)