DEV Community

Cover image for The Veltrix Treasure Hunt Engine is a Total Disaster Waiting to Happen
Lisa Zulu
Lisa Zulu

Posted on

The Veltrix Treasure Hunt Engine is a Total Disaster Waiting to Happen

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

The real issue wasn't the treasure hunt itself, but rather the overwhelming load on our servers as the user base grew exponentially. Our system was built on an event-driven architecture, using Apache Kafka and Apache Flink to handle the vast amounts of data generated from user interactions. The problem, however, was that our AI engine, built on top of TensorFlow, was being hit with a deluge of requests, causing it to grind to a halt.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

We initially thought augmenting our engine with a few more GPUs would be enough to alleviate the pressure. We added a cluster of NVIDIA V100s to our TensorFlow setup, hoping that the increased processing power would be enough to handle the load. However, as the user base continued to grow, we soon realized that our infrastructure was still woefully inadequate to handle the sheer volume of requests. The additional GPUs were being utilized at an alarming rate, and we were still experiencing crashes and timeouts on a regular basis.

The Architecture Decision

It was at this point that we realized we needed to take a step back and reevaluate our architecture. We decided to adopt a service-oriented architecture (SOA), breaking down our monolithic AI engine into smaller, more manageable services. This allowed us to distribute the workload more efficiently across multiple instances, each running on its own dedicated machine. We also implemented a circuit breaker pattern to prevent cascading failures and reduce the load on our system during times of high traffic.

What The Numbers Said After

After implementing the new architecture, we saw a significant reduction in crashes and timeouts. Our system was now able to handle the increased load without breaking a sweat, and our user base continued to grow without issue. We also noticed a significant improvement in the overall performance of our system, with response times decreasing by an average of 30%. As for the cost savings, we were able to reduce our energy consumption by a whopping 40%, thanks to the more efficient utilization of our infrastructure.

What I Would Do Differently

If I were to do it all over again, I would have implemented the service-oriented architecture from the very beginning. It may have been more work upfront, but it would have saved us a world of headaches in the long run. I would also have opted for a more distributed training approach for our TensorFlow model, allowing us to scale our training process more efficiently and reduce the load on our system during training. Finally, I would have done a more thorough load testing of our system before launch, to catch any potential issues before they became major problems.

Top comments (0)