DEV Community

Fran Tufro
Fran Tufro

Posted on • Originally published at onwriting.games on

user investment in branching narrative

Some time ago I read a reddit post where the author commented that, for them, games with branches suffer from an inherent design problem:

... the knowledge that a game's story responds to your choices makes you less invested in the current story, because there's always the knowledge you can go back and do something else.

I have never experienced this, I disengage from the story if the writing is bad.

But with dynamic writing, good story beats, and a good treatment of agency, I don't feel this detachment from the story at all.

In fact, good interactive narrative work, makes want to replay to see what other stories there are besides my first run.

It's possible that there are some players who decide to do option spamming.

But those are not the players we have in mind when we write our stories.

What do you think? Is there any truth to the detachment from stories due to the possibility of "rewind"?

Billboard image

The Next Generation Developer Platform

Coherence is the first Platform-as-a-Service you can control. Unlike "black-box" platforms that are opinionated about the infra you can deploy, Coherence is powered by CNC, the open-source IaC framework, which offers limitless customization.

Learn more

Top comments (0)

AWS Q Developer image

Your AI Code Assistant

Implement features, document your code, or refactor your projects.
Built to handle large projects, Amazon Q Developer works alongside you from idea to production code.

Get started free in your IDE

👋 Kindness is contagious

Please leave a ❤️ or a friendly comment on this post if you found it helpful!

Okay