When you run AI agents in production, you quickly realize:
The dangerous failures aren’t random.
They’re recurring patterns.
Examples:
- Similar hallucination structures
- Repeated tool-call mistakes
- Prompt injection variants
- Context leakage patterns
Most tools give you logs.
Some give you tracing.
Few give you structured failure memory.
I’ve been exploring a model where:
- Every failure becomes a canonical entity
- A deterministic fingerprint is generated for executions
- New executions are matched against historical failures
- A policy engine maps confidence → allow / warn / block
The key idea:
Don’t modify the LLM.
Don’t rely only on prompts.
Insert a deterministic governance layer before execution.
This turns failure history into enforcement intelligence.
Still early, but curious:
LINK : https://github.com/prateekdevisingh/kakveda
How are others handling repeat failure patterns in agent-based systems?
Top comments (0)