What exactly is a “Lala company”? The term is often used to describe businesses that operate in a highly traditional, owner-centric way, where processes are flexible, hierarchy is everything, and the boss’s word can override approximately 17 spreadsheets, three company policies, and common sense itself.
But there is another definition that employees may recognize: a Lala company is a workplace where overtime is not officially mandatory, but somehow everyone knows they are expected to do it; where leadership is happy to take credit but strangely difficult to find when responsibility needs to be taken; where office politics is considered “just how things work”; and where employees are expected to work above and beyond while being paid somewhere between peanuts and slightly more expensive peanuts.
In simple terms, a Lala company is where “above and beyond” is the minimum requirement, and “work-life balance” is something HR puts in a PowerPoint presentation.
Overtime: The Expectation That Nobody Asked For
In a normal company, overtime is supposed to be an exception. In a Lala company, it slowly becomes a lifestyle. Nobody necessarily tells you, “You have to work 15 hours today.” Instead, the message is delivered through subtle psychological techniques.
Leave at 6 PM and someone asks, “You're leaving already?” Leave at 7 PM and you hear, “Everyone else is still working.” Stay until 9 PM and suddenly you're “showing great commitment.” Eventually, the working day stops having a fixed ending and simply continues until management runs out of ideas for things that need to be done.
This is where the magical distinction between requirement and expectation comes into play. Nobody officially says you have to stay late. Nobody needs to. The culture says it for them. Working eight hours is technically acceptable, but working twelve hours demonstrates dedication. Fifteen hours demonstrates passion.
And if someone manages to work fifteen hours every day without complaining, the obvious solution is not to reward them. It is to give them more work, because nothing says “we value your contribution” quite like discovering that an employee still has functioning organs and assigning another task.
Going Above and Beyond, Permanently
There is nothing wrong with occasionally going above and beyond. The problem begins when “above and beyond” becomes the baseline.
An employee does something extra and gets praised for showing initiative. A few months later, that extra task somehow becomes part of their regular responsibilities. The employee helps another department, and suddenly they are expected to support that department permanently. They stay late to finish something urgent, and suddenly staying late becomes normal.
The reward for proving that you can handle more responsibility is, naturally, more responsibility.
Eventually, the job description becomes less of a description and more of a wishlist. Someone might be hired as a developer but eventually find themselves doing development, testing, deployment, customer support, server management, design, troubleshooting, and occasionally fixing the office printer because “you work with computers, right?”
The salary, however, remains loyal to the original job description.
The 15-Hour Workday
In a normal organization, an employee might work eight or nine hours. In a Lala company, the working day follows a completely different mathematical model.
Eight hours is the minimum. Ten hours is good. Twelve hours shows commitment. Fifteen hours demonstrates that the employee is truly dedicated to the company's vision, mission, values, shareholders, clients, and possibly the reincarnation of the founder's grandfather.
The strange part is that working long hours isn't necessarily seen as a sign that the workload is unreasonable. It can instead be interpreted as evidence that the employee is passionate.
This creates a fascinating situation where the solution to excessive workload isn't always hiring more people or improving processes.
Sometimes the solution is simply:
“Can you stay a little longer?”
Salary: The Great Mystery
This brings us to another fascinating feature of the Lala ecosystem: the relationship between workload and compensation.
Responsibilities increase. Working hours increase. Expectations increase. Stress increases. The salary, meanwhile, appears to be following a completely different economic model.
Every once in a while, someone may hear the classic phrase:
“Money isn't everything.”
This is usually delivered by someone who is comfortably earning more money than the person being advised.
Apparently, money isn't everything. But it remains extremely important when discussing rent, groceries, electricity bills, fuel, and literally every other activity required to remain alive.
The employee is expected to show passion, loyalty, commitment, flexibility and ownership. In return, they receive a salary that suggests the company has carefully calculated exactly how little they can pay without the employee immediately disappearing.
Leadership and the Magical Disappearance of Responsibility
Leadership in a Lala company has a remarkable ability to appear exactly when something goes right.
The project succeeds?
“Excellent leadership.”
The client is happy?
“Great management.”
The target is achieved?
“Strong direction from the leadership team.”
But when something goes wrong, leadership suddenly develops an interest in detective work.
“Who handled this?”
“Why wasn't this escalated?”
“Why didn't the employee take ownership?”
It is almost as if responsibility follows gravity.
Success travels upward. Failure travels downward.
The employee is expected to take ownership of problems, but leadership somehow manages to retain ownership of the success.
The formula is remarkably consistent:
Success → Leadership
Failure → Employee
Confusion → HR
Credit: A Renewable Resource for Management
Credit allocation is another fascinating process.
An employee can spend weeks working on a project, solving problems, staying late, fixing mistakes and making sure everything gets delivered. Then comes the presentation, and suddenly the language changes from “what you did” to “what we achieved.”
Sharing credit is perfectly reasonable. Teams are supposed to work together.
The interesting part is when the person who did most of the work somehow becomes a footnote while the person presenting it becomes the hero.
The employee gets:
“Good job.”
The manager gets:
“Excellent leadership.”
The employee gets more work.
The manager gets more credit.
Everyone wins, except perhaps the person who actually did the work.
Office Politics Is Just “How Things Work”
In a healthy organization, office politics should ideally be minimized. In a Lala company, it can become part of the operating system.
Who knows the boss? Important.
Who regularly talks to the boss? Important.
Who was invited into the meeting? Very important.
Who had lunch with the boss? Potentially career-changing information.
Who actually completed the work?
Well, let's not get unnecessarily technical.
Performance obviously matters, but perception can sometimes matter just as much. The person who communicates their contribution the loudest can end up receiving more recognition than the person quietly doing the work.
At that point, the workplace starts rewarding not just productivity but also the ability to successfully navigate the political ecosystem.
Office politics isn't necessarily treated as something that needs fixing.
It becomes part of the culture.
“Aisa toh chalta hai.”
Leave: Technically Available, Practically Discouraged
Then there is the fascinating concept of leave.
In a normal workplace, taking a day off because you're sick or because you have a legitimate personal reason is generally treated as a normal part of being human. In a Lala company, however, taking leave can feel like filing a formal request to temporarily stop being a productive member of society.
And the problem isn't simply that salary can be deducted for taking leave.
The employee can also be scolded, questioned or guilt-tripped for taking it in the first place.
Someone can be genuinely sick, take a day off, and still end up having to explain why they weren't at work.
“Why did you take leave?”
“Why didn't you inform earlier?”
“There's so much work pending.”
“Couldn't you have managed it?”
And if salary is deducted on top of that, the employee gets the complete package: financial punishment plus emotional damage.
The equation becomes beautifully simple:
Leave available + leave taken = salary deduction + lecture.
At that point, employees aren't really being given leave.
They're being given the opportunity to feel guilty about using it.
The Guilt Trip Department
Not every company needs strict rules when it has guilt.
An employee says they need to leave on time, and the response is:
“But everyone else is staying.”
They ask for a day off:
“The team is already under pressure.”
They explain that they've already worked late all week:
“We're all making sacrifices.”
Nobody technically says, “You are not allowed to leave.”
Instead, the employee is made to feel as though leaving on time is somehow a character flaw.
This is particularly effective because it allows management to maintain plausible deniability.
Nobody forced you to stay.
You just happened to feel incredibly uncomfortable leaving.
It's management without officially looking like management.
“We're Like a Family”
And then comes the most powerful phrase in the Lala-company vocabulary:
“We're like a family.”
It is a beautiful concept, particularly because its meaning appears to change depending on who needs something.
When the company needs employees to stay late:
“We're a family.”
When employees need a day off:
“Please refer to company policy.”
When employees work weekends:
“We appreciate your dedication.”
When employees ask about compensation:
“Salary isn't everything.”
And when someone resigns:
“After everything we've done for you?”
Suddenly, the family reunion has begun.
The Performance Review
Eventually comes the performance review.
The employee expects recognition for taking on additional responsibilities, working longer hours and solving problems outside their original role.
Instead:
“You need to take more ownership.”
Ownership?
At this point, some employees have taken so much ownership that they should probably be paying property tax on the project.
Then comes:
“You need to show more initiative.”
So they show more initiative.
The following year:
“You need to manage your workload better.”
They manage it.
The year after that:
“You need to be more flexible.”
Eventually, the employee is no longer being evaluated as an employee.
They're being evaluated as a Swiss Army knife.
And after all of this comes the annual increment:
3%.
Inflation quietly enters the room, looks around, and leaves.
The Problem Isn't Hard Work
To be fair, none of this means that employees shouldn't work hard.
Every company has deadlines. Every job occasionally requires overtime. Sometimes projects genuinely require people to go above and beyond. Emergencies happen, clients make unreasonable demands, and businesses have difficult periods.
The problem begins when the exception becomes the standard.
When overtime becomes an expectation rather than an exception.
When working fifteen hours is considered normal.
When taking legitimate leave is treated as a lack of commitment.
When salary is deducted and employees are still made to feel guilty for taking leave.
When leadership takes credit but avoids responsibility.
When office politics is accepted as normal.
When employees are continuously asked to “show ownership” without receiving the authority, recognition or compensation that should come with that ownership.
That is when a workplace stops being merely demanding and starts becoming dysfunctional.
So, What Is a Lala Company?
A Lala company isn't simply a company where people work hard. Hard work is normal, and every organization occasionally needs people to go the extra mile.
The problem is when the extra mile becomes the entire road.
A Lala company is a workplace where overtime becomes an expectation rather than an exception, where twelve-to-fifteen-hour days are treated as dedication, where “going above and beyond” becomes the minimum requirement, where leadership happily collects credit but mysteriously disappears when responsibility needs to be taken, where blame travels downward and credit travels upward, where office politics is treated as normal, where taking leave can result in salary deductions and a lecture, and where employees are guilt-tripped for having completely reasonable boundaries.
In the simplest possible terms:
A Lala company is a place where the employee is expected to work like the owner, think like the manager, take responsibility like the CEO, tolerate pressure like a monk, remain available like a 24/7 customer-support line, and get paid like an intern.
And if anyone questions the system, there is always one final answer:
“Aisa toh chalta hai.”
And perhaps that is the biggest problem of all.
Because once “aisa toh chalta hai” becomes the answer to everything, eventually nothing needs to improve.
Top comments (0)