As automated material handling and unmanned logistics continue to gain traction, Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) are being widely adopted in factories, warehouses, hospitals, and retail environments.
🚨 But before launching an AMR project, there’s one key technical decision you can’t overlook: Which type of AMR chassis is best for your application?
In this article, we’ll break down the four most common AMR base types, comparing their structures, advantages, limitations, and use cases to help you choose the right foundation for your mobile robot.
1. Differential Drive Chassis
How It Works:
Two powered wheels and one or two passive caster wheels. Movement is controlled by adjusting the speed of the drive wheels.
Pros:
- Simple mechanical design, low cost
- Mature, easy-to-implement control algorithms
- Ideal for light-duty, small-scale AMR projects
Cons:
- Large turning radius, poor in tight spaces
- Limited traction and ground adaptability
- Cannot rotate in place
Typical Use Cases:
E-commerce warehouse robots, basic AGVs, entry-level logistics AMRs
2. Omnidirectional Wheel Chassis (Mecanum or Omni Wheels)
How It Works:
Angled rollers on the wheels enable full-directional movement: sideways, diagonally, and rotation on the spot.
Pros:
- Excellent mobility and flexibility
- Works well in narrow or complex spaces
- Ideal for precise docking and multi-robot coordination
Cons:
- Requires smooth, flat surfaces
- Higher hardware and development cost
- Complex control algorithms
Typical Use Cases:
Smart factories, indoor collaborative AMRs, production line docking robots
3. Steerable Drive Chassis (Differential + Steering Wheels)
How It Works:
Combines differential drive with a steering mechanism for better control and load-bearing.
Pros:
- High load capacity for heavy-duty work
- Smooth and stable at medium speed
- Good maneuverability in semi-narrow areas
Cons:
- More expensive than standard differential
- Complex structure, higher maintenance
- Needs level ground to perform optimally
Typical Use Cases:
Heavy-duty AMRs, autonomous forklifts, tow robots
4. Four-Wheel Independent Drive (4WD)
How It Works:
Each wheel has independent drive and steering, enabling full omnidirectional motion with strong ground adaptability.
Pros:
- True omnidirectional movement
- Can handle slopes, bumps, and uneven surfaces
- Ideal for advanced navigation and outdoor tasks
Cons:
- Highest cost among all options
- Complex to build, develop, and maintain
- May be over-engineered for simple indoor use
Typical Use Cases:
Outdoor AMRs, hospital delivery robots, high-end custom robotic platforms
How to Choose: 3-Step Decision Guide
1. Evaluate Load and Terrain
- Light load / smooth floors → Differential drive
- Heavy load / ramps / outdoors → 4WD independent drive
2. Assess Space and Maneuverability
- Tight spaces / lateral movement → Omnidirectional
- Open layouts / fixed paths → Differential or steerable drive
3. Consider Budget and Maintenance
- Budget-conscious → Differential drive
- High-performance or complex needs → Omnidirectional or 4WD
🧠 Final Thoughts: The Right Chassis Is Half the Battle
Choosing the right AMR chassis isn't just a technical detail—it determines how your robot behaves, scales, and performs in real-world environments.
A smart choice up front means:
- Better performance
- Lower deployment risks
- Faster return on investment
🔗 Original Article:
https://reemanbot.blogspot.com/2025/07/avoid-costly-mistakes-how-to-choose.html
Got questions or working on an AMR project? Feel free to connect or share
Top comments (0)