Async/Await Is Overused — And It’s Hurting JavaScript Performance

Async/await made JavaScript look simpler — but in many apps, it quietly made things slower.

Async/await is everywhere:

Node.js APIs

Frontend data fetching

Database calls

Loops, helpers, utilities — everything

But here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Async/await is often used where it’s not needed — and that misuse costs performance.

Let’s break this down with real-world reasoning, not hype.

🚨 The Promise of Async/Await

Async/await was introduced to:

Improve readability

Replace callback hell

Make async code look synchronous

And it worked — for readability.

But performance?
That depends on how you use it.

❌ The Most Common Mistake
Sequential async execution (accidentally)

await task1();
await task2();
await task3();

Looks clean.
But this runs one after another, not in parallel.

If each task takes 300ms:

Total time = 900ms

What developers think is happening

“JavaScript is async, so it must be fast”

What actually happens

The event loop is waiting… and waiting… and waiting.

✅ The Better Approach (When Tasks Are Independent)

await Promise.all([
  task1(),
  task2(),
  task3()
]);

Now:

Tasks run concurrently

Total time ≈ 300ms

Same logic.
3× faster.

🧠 Async/Await ≠ Parallelism

This is where most developers get confused.

Async/await:

Does not make code parallel

Does not bypass the event loop

Does not make CPU tasks faster

It only:

Pauses execution until a promise resolves

Yields control back to the event loop

🔥 Async/Await Inside Loops (Silent Killer)

This pattern is everywhere:

for (const id of ids) {
  await fetchUser(id);
}

If ids.length = 100
You just created 100 sequential network calls 😬

The Correct Pattern

await Promise.all(
  ids.map(id => fetchUser(id))
);

This single change can:

Reduce API latency drastically

Improve throughput

Cut server costs

⚠️ Async Functions Always Return Promises

Even when you don’t need async behavior:

async function sum(a, b) {
  return a + b;
}

This:

Wraps return value in a promise

Adds microtask overhead

Slows hot paths in tight loops

Sometimes, plain functions are better.

🧪 Real Performance Impact in Node.js

In high-throughput systems:

Extra awaits = more microtasks

More microtasks = event loop pressure

Event loop pressure = latency spikes

This matters when:

Handling thousands of requests

Processing queues

Running batch jobs

🚫 Overusing Try/Catch with Async/Await

Another hidden cost:

try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (e) {
  log(e);
}

Problems:

try/catch blocks are not free

Wrapped around large async sections

Often used “just in case”

Better:

Catch only where failure is expected

Let errors bubble when appropriate

🧠 When Async/Await Is Perfect

Async/await is excellent for:

Request handlers

Business logic

Sequential workflows

Readability-first code

Not for:

CPU-heavy loops

High-frequency utility functions

Parallelizable workloads

🛑 The Readability vs Performance Tradeoff

Async/await optimizes for:
✅ Developer experience
❌ Runtime efficiency (if misused)

And most teams:

Optimize for readability first

Never revisit performance later

That’s how slow code reaches production.

🧠 Senior-Level Rule of Thumb

Use async/await by default — but question it in hot paths.

Ask:

Does this need to be sequential?

Can this run in parallel?

Is async even required here?

🔥 Final Takeaway

Async/await didn’t make JavaScript slower.

Overusing it did.

If your app feels slow:

Check your awaits

Check your loops

Check your assumptions

medium.com