Microservices are one of the most talked-about topics in modern software development. They show up in conference talks, blog posts, and architecture diagrams full of boxes and arrows.
And yet, many developers end up asking the same question a few months later:
“Why did this get so complicated so fast?”
This article isn’t about avoiding microservices. It’s about deploying them without turning your codebase and infrastructure into a constant source of pain.
Microservices Add Power — and Friction
Microservices promise a lot:
- Independent deployments
- Better scalability
- Clear ownership
- Tech stack flexibility
But every microservice you deploy also adds:
- Network calls instead of in-memory calls
- More failure modes
- More logs, metrics, and alerts to maintain
- More deployment pipelines to debug
If you’re not feeling those problems yet, microservices won’t magically future-proof your system. They’ll just move complexity from your code to your runtime.
As developers, we should treat microservices as an optimization, not a starting point.
Overengineering Usually Starts With Good Intentions
Most overengineered systems don’t come from bad developers. They come from teams trying to “do things right”:
- Setting up Kubernetes for a product with low traffic
- Splitting services before understanding domain boundaries
- Introducing async messaging without real async needs
- Deploying multiple databases “just in case”
The result?
More YAML than business logic, slower feedback loops, and harder debugging.
Smart architecture reduces cognitive load. Overengineering multiplies it.
Start With a Strong Core (Yes, Even a Monolith)
A well-structured monolith is still one of the most productive architectures for developers.
The key is how you build it:
- Modular boundaries inside the codebase
- Clear interfaces between domains
- Minimal shared state
- No “god modules”
If you can’t explain your system boundaries inside a monolith, you won’t magically fix that by splitting it into microservices.
Good microservices usually come from good modular design first.
When Microservices Actually Help Developers
Microservices start making sense when developers feel real friction, such as:
- Deploying one small change requires redeploying everything
- Teams constantly step on each other’s code
- One module needs to scale way more than the rest
- Release cycles slow down due to tight coupling
When these problems appear, microservices can reduce complexity instead of increasing it.
Until then, they often do the opposite.
A Practical Path to Microservices Deployment
If you’re moving toward microservices, do it intentionally:
1. Extract One Service at a Time
Start with a clear, isolated domain. Avoid splitting everything at once.
2. Prefer Synchronous First
Async messaging is powerful, but it adds complexity fast. Use it when you need it.
3. Automate Early
Before deploying many services, make sure you have:
- CI/CD pipelines
- Centralized logging
- Metrics and basic tracing
Without this, debugging becomes guesswork.
4. Treat Network Calls as Unreliable
Timeouts, retries, and fallbacks are not optional in microservices—they’re required.
Microservices Don’t Make Bad Design Disappear
Microservices won’t fix:
- Poor domain modeling
- Tight coupling
- Unclear ownership
- Lack of tests
They make these problems more visible and more expensive.
As developers, our goal isn’t to build the most complex architecture possible.
It’s to build systems that are easy to change, easy to deploy, and easy to understand.
Final Takeaway
Microservices are great — when they’re earned.
If your current setup is simple and productive, don’t rush to complicate it. If your system is pushing back, listen to the signals and evolve deliberately.
The smartest microservices deployments aren’t the ones with the most services.
They’re the ones where developers can ship confidently without fighting the architecture every day.
Top comments (0)