Structuring an Angular app may seem straightforward at first-just put components in one folder, services in another, and models in their own. But as projects grow, that neat separation can quickly turn into a maze of files.
Reflecting on a recent project, I realized how much time I wasted bouncing between folders just to make a small change in one feature. That’s when I decided to shift from the type-based structure to a feature-based design-and it completely changed how I build and maintain Angular apps.
In this post, I’ll walk you through why this shift clicked for me, the challenges it solved, and how it makes apps more modular and scalable.
🛠️ Challenges with Type-Based Structure
At first, the default structure looked clean:
/components
/services
/models
But real-world development quickly exposed its flaws:
- Scattered Logic: Updating a single feature meant editing files across multiple folders.
- Onboarding Pain: New developers struggled to trace what belonged to which feature.
- Scaling Issues: As features grew, so did the complexity of managing cross-folder dependencies.
🔄 The Shift to Feature-Based Design
Instead of grouping files by type, I started grouping them by feature:
/features
/dashboard
dashboard.component.ts
dashboard.service.ts
dashboard.module.ts
/user
user.component.ts
user.service.ts
user.model.ts
Everything related to “User” now lives in one place. Need to update user logic? It’s all inside /user
. Want to add a new feature? Create a new folder and keep it self-contained.
🚀 Benefits I Experienced
The difference was immediate:
- Modularity → Features became self-contained, easier to maintain, and simpler to test.
- Scalability → Features could be lazy-loaded, reducing initial bundle size.
- Collaboration → Teams could work on different features in parallel with minimal conflicts.
- Clarity → The structure told a story. Even new developers instantly knew where to look.
📖 Lessons Learned
Making the switch taught me a few key lessons:
- Align with Angular’s Strengths: Angular is inherently module-driven, so a feature-based structure plays to its strengths.
- Think in Features, Not Files: Real-world applications evolve around features, not isolated file types.
- Refactor Early: The earlier you move to feature-based design, the less painful the transition.
🏁 Conclusion
Shifting to feature-based design wasn’t just a structural change-it was a mindset shift. By organizing code around features instead of file types, I cut down development time, reduced confusion, and made the codebase far more modular.
If you’re still working with a type-based Angular structure, I encourage you to try the feature-based approach. Like me, you might find it just clicks.
Here’s to building modular, scalable, and developer-friendly Angular apps 🚀
Top comments (0)