DEV Community

selfhosting.sh
selfhosting.sh

Posted on • Originally published at selfhosting.sh

Music Streaming

#linux #opensource #resources #software

Quick Picks

Use Case Best Choice Why
Best overall Navidrome Lightweight, fast, Subsonic API compatible, runs on anything
Best for federation/social Funkwhale ActivityPub support, share music across instances
Best all-in-one media server Jellyfin Handles music alongside video, books, and photos
Best web UI Koel Spotify-like interface, equalizer, visualizer
Most feature-rich legacy option Ampache 20+ years of features, video support, granular permissions
Best lightweight Subsonic server gonic Minimal resource usage, no web UI, just serves Subsonic clients
Best for Squeezebox hardware LMS Native Squeezebox ecosystem, plugins for everything
Best library organizer (not a server) Beets Fix tags, fetch metadata, normalize your library before serving it

What to Look for in a Self-Hosted Music Server

Before picking a server, know what actually matters:

Subsonic API compatibility. This is the single most important factor for mobile listening. The Subsonic API is a de facto standard that dozens of mobile apps support — Symfonium (Android), play:Sub (iOS), DSub, Ultrasonic, and more. If a server speaks Subsonic, you get excellent mobile apps for free without the project maintaining its own. Navidrome, Ampache, gonic, and Airsonic-Advanced all support it.

Transcoding. If your library is FLAC and you want to stream over cellular, the server needs to transcode to a lower bitrate on the fly. Most servers handle this, but check whether it needs FFmpeg installed separately.

Resource usage. Music servers vary wildly. Navidrome and gonic run comfortably on a Raspberry Pi. Funkwhale and Jellyfin need a real server with 2-4 GB of RAM. Match the server to your hardware.

Multi-user support. If your household shares a server, you want separate accounts with independent playlists, favorites, and play history. Every server on this list supports multiple users, but the quality of the implementation varies.

Smart playlists. Auto-generated playlists based on rules (genre, year, play count, rating) are what separate a music server from a file browser. Navidrome, Ampache, and Koel do this well. Gonic does not.

The Full Ranking

1. Navidrome -- Best Overall

Navidrome is the best self-hosted music streaming server for most people. It is lightweight (30-50 MB of RAM idle), fast (written in Go), and fully compatible with the Subsonic API. That API compatibility means you can use any Subsonic-compatible mobile app — Symfonium, play:Sub, DSub, Ultrasonic — as your client. The built-in web UI is clean and responsive, with album art, smart playlists, lyrics, and Last.fm scrobbling.

Navidrome scans your existing music directory without modifying or copying files. Point it at your /music folder and it indexes everything. It supports FLAC, MP3, AAC, OGG, OPUS, WMA, and more. Transcoding is handled via FFmpeg when clients request a lower bitrate.

The project is actively maintained with frequent releases. It went from v0.54 to v0.60.3 in early 2026, adding Jukebox mode, improved smart playlists, and better multi-disk album handling.

Pros:

  • Extremely lightweight — runs on a Raspberry Pi with room to spare
  • Full Subsonic API means dozens of mobile app choices
  • Clean web UI with smart playlists, favorites, ratings, and lyrics
  • Fast library scanning even with 100,000+ tracks
  • Last.fm and ListenBrainz scrobbling built in
  • Multi-user with per-user playlists and play history
  • Single Go binary or Docker image — trivial to deploy

Cons:

  • No podcast support (it is a music server, not a podcast player)
  • No video support (use Jellyfin for that)
  • No federation or social features
  • Web UI is functional but not as visually rich as Koel

Best for: Anyone who wants a dedicated music server that is fast, light, and works with the best mobile apps available.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Navidrome

Quick Start: Navidrome with Docker Compose 

services:
  navidrome:
    image: deluan/navidrome:0.60.3
    container_name: navidrome
    restart: unless-stopped
    ports:
      - "4533:4533"  # Web UI and Subsonic API
    environment:
      ND_SCANSCHEDULE: "1h"              # Rescan library every hour
      ND_LOGLEVEL: "info"
      ND_BASEURL: ""                     # Set to "/navidrome" if behind a subpath proxy
      ND_SESSIONTIMEOUT: "24h"
      ND_ENABLETRANSCODINGCONFIG: "true" # Allow users to configure transcoding
    volumes:
      - navidrome-data:/data             # Database and cache
      - /path/to/your/music:/music:ro    # CHANGE: Your music library (read-only)

volumes:
  navidrome-data:
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Start it with docker compose up -d and open http://your-server:4533. Create your admin account on first access. Connect a mobile app using the server URL with /rest as the Subsonic endpoint.

2. Funkwhale -- Best for Social and Federation

Funkwhale is not just a music server — it is a federated music platform. It supports ActivityPub, the same protocol behind Mastodon, meaning Funkwhale instances can share music libraries with each other. Upload your own music, subscribe to podcasts, follow users on other instances, and build shared playlists across the fediverse.

Funkwhale has a modern web UI with playlist management, favorites, radio modes, and podcast support. It uses a Django/Python backend with PostgreSQL and Redis, which means it is heavier than Navidrome — expect 500 MB to 1 GB of RAM usage.

Pros:

  • ActivityPub federation — share and discover music across instances
  • Podcast support built in
  • Modern, attractive web UI
  • Channels system for content organization
  • Multi-user with granular permissions
  • API for third-party clients

Cons:

  • Significantly heavier than Navidrome (PostgreSQL + Redis + Celery workers)
  • No Subsonic API — limited mobile app options (Funkwhale has its own app, but ecosystem is small)
  • Federation features require a publicly accessible server with a domain
  • Setup is more involved than simpler servers
  • Smaller community and slower release cadence

Best for: Users who want social features, federation with other instances, and podcast support alongside their music library.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Funkwhale

3. Jellyfin -- Best All-in-One Media Server

Jellyfin is primarily a video media server, but its music support is solid enough to be a strong contender — especially if you already run it for movies and TV. You get a unified library for video, music, audiobooks, and photos, with a single web UI and mobile apps covering everything.

Jellyfin's music features include album browsing, artist pages, playlists, lyrics, and Last.fm scrobbling via plugin. It supports hardware transcoding for video (Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC, VA-API), and software transcoding for audio. The mobile apps (Jellyfin for Android/iOS, Finamp for music-focused use) are free.

The trade-off is that Jellyfin's music experience is a generalist's implementation. It lacks Subsonic API support (unless you add a plugin), smart playlists are limited compared to Navidrome, and the music UI is not as refined as a dedicated music server.

Pros:

  • One server for all your media — video, music, books, photos
  • Completely free and open-source, no premium tier
  • Hardware transcoding at no cost
  • Finamp mobile app is a good dedicated music client
  • Active development and large community
  • Plugin ecosystem (Last.fm, Lyrics, OpenSubtitles)

Cons:

  • Music is not the primary focus — UI is video-oriented
  • No native Subsonic API (plugin exists but is unofficial)
  • Smart playlist support is basic
  • Heavier than dedicated music servers (1-2 GB RAM minimum)
  • Library scanning can be slower with large music collections

Best for: Users who already run Jellyfin for video and want one server for everything, or who want a single-install solution for all media types.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Jellyfin

4. Koel -- Best Web UI

Koel has the most visually polished web interface of any self-hosted music server. Built with Vue.js, it looks and feels like a modern streaming service — album art grids, smooth transitions, a built-in equalizer, and a visualizer. If you primarily listen to music from a browser and want the experience to feel like Spotify, Koel delivers.

Koel supports smart playlists, Last.fm scrobbling, optional Spotify integration (for browsing Spotify's catalog alongside your local library), and multi-user accounts. It is a Laravel/PHP application backed by MariaDB.

Pros:

  • The best-looking web UI of any self-hosted music server
  • Built-in equalizer and visualizer
  • Smart playlists with rule-based filtering
  • Last.fm scrobbling
  • Optional Spotify integration for catalog browsing
  • Multi-user support

Cons:

  • No Subsonic API — no third-party mobile apps
  • Mobile experience is web-only (responsive, but no native app)
  • Requires PHP and MariaDB — heavier stack than Go-based alternatives
  • Smaller community than Navidrome or Jellyfin
  • No podcast or video support
  • APP_KEY must be pre-generated before first start

Best for: Users who listen primarily from a browser and want the most visually appealing experience. Not ideal if mobile apps matter to you.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Koel

5. Ampache -- Most Feature-Rich Legacy Option

Ampache has been around since 2001, making it one of the oldest self-hosted music servers still actively maintained. That longevity shows — it has an enormous feature set covering music, video, podcasts, radio streams, and Subsonic API compatibility. It supports multiple music catalogs, granular user permissions, and flexible access controls.

Ampache v7.x modernized the web UI significantly, but it still carries the weight of two decades of features. The PHP/MySQL stack is familiar but heavier than newer Go-based alternatives. If you need features like per-catalog permissions, democratic playback (users vote on the next song), or built-in video support alongside music, Ampache is the only option that does it all.

Pros:

  • Subsonic API compatible — works with Subsonic mobile apps
  • 20+ years of feature accumulation — covers edge cases others do not
  • Podcast and radio stream support
  • Video support alongside music
  • Multiple music catalogs with per-catalog permissions
  • Democratic playback mode
  • Active development (v7.9.2 as of March 2026)

Cons:

  • UI shows its age despite modernization efforts
  • PHP/MySQL stack is heavier to maintain than Go-based servers
  • Configuration can be complex due to the sheer number of options
  • Documentation is extensive but sometimes outdated
  • Scanning large libraries can be slow

Best for: Power users who need granular control, multiple catalogs, or the combination of music, video, and podcast support in a single server.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Ampache

6. gonic -- Lightest Subsonic Server

gonic strips the concept of a music server down to its essentials. It is a Subsonic-compatible server written in Go with almost no web UI — you manage and listen to your library entirely through Subsonic client apps. This makes it the lightest option available, running on less than 20 MB of RAM.

gonic supports on-the-fly transcoding, multi-user accounts, Last.fm/ListenBrainz scrobbling, and podcast downloads. It scans your music directory and serves it over the Subsonic API. That is all it does, and it does it well.

Pros:

  • Extremely lightweight — under 20 MB RAM
  • Full Subsonic API compatibility
  • Podcast support
  • Last.fm and ListenBrainz scrobbling
  • Minimal attack surface — barely any web UI to exploit

Cons:

  • No web UI for playback — you must use Subsonic client apps
  • No smart playlists
  • No lyrics display
  • Smaller community than Navidrome
  • Fewer configuration options

Best for: Users who exclusively use Subsonic mobile apps and want the lightest possible server footprint. Ideal for Raspberry Pi or low-power NAS devices.

7. Airsonic-Advanced -- Legacy Subsonic Fork

Airsonic-Advanced is a fork of the original Airsonic project, which itself forked from Subsonic when Subsonic went proprietary. It is a Java application with a web UI, Subsonic API compatibility, podcast support, and jukebox mode.

Development has slowed significantly. The project's last major release was in 2023, and activity on GitHub is sparse. Navidrome has effectively replaced it in the self-hosted music ecosystem. We include it here for completeness and for users who have existing Airsonic installations.

Pros:

  • Subsonic API compatible
  • Podcast support
  • Jukebox mode (play through server speakers)
  • Familiar to long-time Subsonic users

Cons:

  • Development is stalled — last significant release was 2023
  • Java-based with higher resource usage (500 MB+ RAM)
  • UI feels dated
  • Navidrome does everything Airsonic does, but lighter and actively maintained

Best for: Existing Airsonic users who have not yet migrated. For new installations, use Navidrome instead.

8. LMS (Logitech Media Server) -- Best for Squeezebox

LMS is the server component of the Squeezebox ecosystem. If you have Squeezebox hardware or use software Squeezebox players (like piCorePlayer on a Raspberry Pi), LMS is the only real option. It has a massive plugin ecosystem covering internet radio, streaming service integration, multi-room audio, and advanced DSP.

LMS is a niche pick. It excels in the Squeezebox world but is not a general-purpose music streaming server. If you do not have Squeezebox hardware or software players, skip it.

Pros:

  • Native Squeezebox ecosystem support
  • Enormous plugin library
  • Multi-room synchronized audio
  • Internet radio integration
  • Material Design web interface via plugin

Cons:

  • Tied to the Squeezebox ecosystem
  • Perl-based — unusual stack to maintain
  • No Subsonic API
  • UI requires a plugin to look modern
  • Not a general-purpose music server

Best for: Squeezebox hardware owners. No one else.

Honorable Mention: Beets

Beets is not a streaming server — it is a music library management tool. It fixes tags, fetches metadata from MusicBrainz, normalizes album art, detects duplicates, and organizes files into a consistent directory structure. If your music library is a mess of inconsistent tags and folder names, run Beets before pointing any server at it. Navidrome, Ampache, and every other server on this list will produce better results when fed a well-organized library.

Full Feature Comparison

Feature Navidrome Funkwhale Jellyfin Koel Ampache gonic Airsonic-Adv. LMS
Subsonic API Yes No Plugin No Yes Yes Yes No
Web UI Good Good Good Excellent Adequate Minimal Dated Plugin
Mobile apps Via Subsonic Own app Finamp Web only Via Subsonic Via Subsonic Via Subsonic Own app
Smart playlists Yes Basic Basic Yes Yes No Basic Via plugin
Transcoding FFmpeg Built-in FFmpeg FFmpeg Built-in FFmpeg FFmpeg Built-in
Podcast support No Yes Via plugin No Yes Yes Yes Via plugin
Multi-user Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Federation/social No ActivityPub No No No No No No
Lyrics Yes No Via plugin No Yes No No Via plugin
Last.fm scrobbling Yes No Via plugin Yes Yes Yes Yes Via plugin
Docker image Official Official Official Official Official Official Community Community
RAM usage (idle) ~30-50 MB ~500 MB+ ~300 MB+ ~150 MB ~200 MB ~15-20 MB ~500 MB+ ~200 MB
Language Go Python C# PHP PHP Go Java Perl
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0 MIT AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Active development Very active Active Very active Active Active Active Stalled Active

How We Evaluated

We assessed each server on five criteria, weighted by what matters most to someone replacing Spotify or Apple Music with a self-hosted solution:

  1. Mobile experience (30%) — Can you stream your library on the go with a good app? Subsonic API compatibility is a massive advantage here because it unlocks the best third-party apps.
  2. Setup simplicity (20%) — How quickly can you go from docker compose up to playing music? Fewer dependencies and simpler configs score higher.
  3. Resource efficiency (20%) — Can it run on modest hardware? A music server should not require a dedicated workstation.
  4. Feature set (20%) — Smart playlists, lyrics, scrobbling, transcoding, multi-user.
  5. Community and maintenance (10%) — Active development, responsive community, regular releases.

Navidrome scores highest across these criteria, which is why it is our top pick. It is not the most feature-rich (Ampache) or the most visually impressive (Koel), but it nails the combination of lightweight deployment, excellent mobile support, and active development.

Related

Top comments (0)