If you’ve run agents on long-horizon work, you’ve probably seen the same failure mode: the agent
forgets prior decisions, repeats mistakes, and gradually degrades output quality.
Finite context windows guarantee this over time unless you add durable memory and retrieval.
I built ContextLattice to solve that problem with a local-first architecture that is
private by default and MCP-compatible by design.
- Docs: https://contextlattice.io/installation.html
- Repo: https://github.com/sheawinkler/ContextLattice
## 1) Problem Framing
Long-running agent workflows need more than prompt history.
Without a durable memory/context layer:
- prior decisions are lost
- the same debugging loops repeat
- retrieval quality drifts over time
- operators keep manually re-injecting context
ContextLattice addresses this with one ingress path for writes and one orchestrated retrieval
path for reads.
## 2) Architecture
The runtime pattern is:
- HTTP-first ingress for write/search
- durable outbox queue
- fanout to specialized sinks
- federated retrieval + rerank
- learning feedback loop
### Write flow
- Client posts to
/memory/write - Payload is validated and normalized
- Durable outbox stores the job
- Fanout writes to:
- memory-bank (canonical)
- Qdrant (semantic vectors)
- Mongo (raw ledger)
- MindsDB (+ optional Letta path)
### Retrieval flow
- Orchestrator issues parallel recall across sources
- Results are merged + reranked
- Composed context is returned to the caller
- Feedback signals are written for retrieval-quality learning
This keeps ingress simple while allowing storage/retrieval specialization behind the
orchestrator.
## 3) Operational Controls
This stack is designed for bursty real traffic, not just demos.
Key controls:
- backpressure at fanout boundaries
- retry + replay semantics from durable queue
- retention and pruning policies for storage pressure
- strict secret-handling modes (
redact,block,allow) - local-first defaults (loopback binding, auth-required production posture)
The result is a system that can function as both:
- a long-horizon memory/context layer, and
- a telemetry-grade write backend.
## 4) What Actually Mattered in Practice
The most important implementation outcomes were:
- One ingress contract reduced client integration complexity.
- Durable queueing prevented sink instability from dropping writes.
- Federated retrieval outperformed single-store recall on long tasks.
- Local-first defaults reduced deployment friction and security risk.
## 5) Quickstart
bash
cp .env.example .env
ln -svf ../../.env infra/compose/.env
gmake quickstart
Then verify:
ORCH_KEY="$(awk -F= '/^MEMMCP_ORCHESTRATOR_API_KEY=/{print substr($0,index($0,"=")+1)}' .env)"
curl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:8075/health | jq
curl -fsS -H "x-api-key: ${ORCH_KEY}" http://127.0.0.1:8075/status | jq
## 6) Closing
If you’re building long-horizon agent systems, I’d value feedback on:
- retrieval quality over long task horizons
- operator ergonomics under sustained write pressure
- practical tradeoffs between local-only and optional BYO cloud sinks
- Docs: https://contextlattice.io/installation.html
- Troubleshooting: https://contextlattice.io/troubleshooting.html
- Repo: https://github.com/sheawinkler/ContextLattice
Top comments (0)