UAT had passed.
The tests were done.
The obvious bugs were fixed.
Everyone was getting ready for go-live.
So why did we stop and ask:
“Wait... are we actually ready?”
Because we realized something important.
UAT was telling us about the software. It wasn't telling us everything about the rollout.
What Was Missing?
Passing UAT doesn't automatically tell you:
- Whether all critical blockers are closed
- Whether the right stakeholders have signed off
- Whether users are trained
- Whether important feedback has been resolved
- Whether remaining risks are understood
- Whether handover is ready
The software can be tested and accepted while the rollout itself still has gaps.
That's the Dangerous Part
The dangerous assumption is:
UAT Passed
↓
Ready to Go Live
But real rollouts are more like:
UAT
↓
Defects & Retesting
↓
Sign-off
↓
Training
↓
Feedback
↓
Blockers & Risks
↓
Readiness
↓
Go-Live
↓
Handover
The more disconnected these activities are, the harder it becomes to answer one simple question:
“Are we actually ready?”
This Is Why We're Building Verixa
Verixa connects the activities between software delivery and rollout readiness — from UAT and defects to sign-off, training, feedback, blockers, readiness, and handover.
Because we don't just want teams to know that their software passed testing.
We want them to know what still stands between tested software and a successful rollout.
We're opening the waitlist for early users.
Join now and get your first month free.
What does your team check before going live?
Is “UAT passed” enough, or do you have a separate rollout-readiness process?
Top comments (0)