DEV Community

Cover image for SnapDeploy vs AWS: Container Deployment Without the Complexity
SnapDeploy
SnapDeploy

Posted on • Originally published at snapdeploy.dev

SnapDeploy vs AWS: Container Deployment Without the Complexity

TL;DR: AWS offers 4+ ways to run containers, but most are overkill for small teams. ECS + Fargate = free control plane, 3 concepts to learn, no servers to manage. Compare deployment steps, features, and costs below.


AWS is the undisputed leader in cloud computing, but that doesn't make it the right choice for every project.

For developers who want to deploy containers without becoming cloud architects, AWS can feel like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame.


The AWS Container Problem

AWS offers multiple ways to run containers:

  • ECS — AWS's native container orchestration
  • EKS — Managed Kubernetes ($73/month control plane)
  • App Runner — Simplified container deployment
  • Fargate — Serverless containers (no EC2 to manage)

Each comes with its own learning curve, pricing model, IAM permissions, and networking setup.


Deployment Comparison

Deploying on AWS ECS (Direct)

  1. Set up VPC, subnets, security groups, IAM roles
  2. Create ECR repository, build and push image
  3. Create task definition (100+ lines of JSON)
  4. Create ECS cluster and service
  5. Set up load balancer and SSL

Time: 2-4 hours (first time)

Deploying with Abstraction

  1. Click "New Container"
  2. Select repository and branch
  3. Click "Deploy"

Time: 5 minutes


Feature Comparison

Feature Abstracted Platform AWS ECS Direct
Time to deploy 5 minutes 2-4 hours
SSL Certificates Automatic Manual (ACM)
Custom domains Built-in ALB + Route53
Learning curve None Steep
Pause containers Yes No
CI/CD pipeline Automatic Manual (CodePipeline)
Log management Built-in dashboard CloudWatch setup

When to Use Each

Use AWS directly when you need:

  • Enterprise scale with specific compliance requirements
  • Deep AWS service integrations (RDS, ElastiCache, SQS, etc.)
  • Existing AWS investment and team expertise
  • Multi-region with custom networking

Use an abstraction platform when you need:

  • Speed over complexity
  • Cost-effective development and staging
  • Simple web applications and APIs
  • Small teams without dedicated DevOps

Cost Comparison

For a small API running 24/7:

Item AWS Direct Abstracted
Compute (Fargate) ~$30/month Included
Load Balancer (ALB) ~$18/month Included
NAT Gateway ~$15/month Included
SSL (ACM) Free Included
Total ~$63+/month $9/month

The hidden costs of AWS (ALB, NAT Gateway, data transfer) add up fast for small projects.


The Mental Model Difference

AWS ECS: 10+ Concepts

VPC, Subnets, Security Groups, IAM Roles, ECR, Task Definitions, Services, Clusters, Target Groups, Load Balancers, Route53, ACM...

Abstracted: 3 Concepts

Repository, Container, Deploy.


Key Takeaways

Question Answer
Is AWS too complex for small teams? For containers, yes — unless you use an abstraction
Is EKS worth $73/month control plane? Not for most startups
Can you get AWS-grade infra without the complexity? Yes — platforms built on ECS/Fargate handle this
When does raw AWS make sense? Enterprise scale, compliance, deep integrations

AWS is incredibly powerful. But power without simplicity is just complexity. For most container deployments, an abstraction layer gives you 90% of the benefit at 10% of the effort.

Top comments (0)