If you ship useful software but struggle to get anyone outside your Slack to notice, this guide is for you. I’ll anchor the ideas with real-world patterns and point you to further reading like Strategic PR as a growth tool so you can go deeper after you’re done here.
Why developers should care about PR (and why it’s not fluff)
Public relations isn’t press releases and champagne photos. It’s the discipline of turning your work into credible narratives that the right people can trust: users, contributors, partners, investors, and future teammates. Done well, PR is how you compress the time it takes for strangers to believe you.
Think of it as an interface between your product and the market. Your code is a set of functions; your PR is the documentation and examples that help people understand when and why to call those functions. Without it, you’re a brilliant library buried on page 37 of someone’s search results—and that means slower feedback loops, slower adoption, and ultimately slower learning.
A narrative is an API: inputs, outputs, constraints
The best narratives are simple, testable, and cost-aware:
- Inputs: What changed in the world (a regulation, a new runtime, a price collapse) that makes your product necessary now?
- Output: What measurable outcome do you enable for a user persona in under 30 days?
- Constraints: What trade-offs do you accept and why are they sane (security over speed, accuracy over breadth, cost ceiling over raw performance)?
When you state these clearly, journalists, community leaders, and decision-makers can propagate your story without a 90-minute briefing. You make it easy to be referenced.
Proof beats adjectives
People don’t believe adjectives; they believe evidence. Replace “blazing-fast” with a reproducible benchmark repo; swap “enterprise-grade” for a signed case study with before/after metrics; trade “AI-powered” for a model card and failure modes. If you can be open about what your system doesn’t do, your claims about what it does do will stick.
A helpful mental model: What could a skeptical engineer verify in 15 minutes? That’s your proof surface. Shape your public materials around that: an example dataset, a Docker compose, a public status page with SLOs, a changelog that explains why things changed, not just that they changed.
Distribution is design: Own, Earned, Borrowed
You already know owned channels (docs, blog, newsletter). Earned channels are the mentions you don’t buy: podcasts, guest articles, conference talks, community newsletters. Borrowed channels are credible directories, indexes, and third-party profiles that function as trust scaffolding. A tidy example: a clean business listing like the TechWaves London listing can help journalists and partners confirm you exist, have an address, and respond. It’s not glamorous—but credibility rarely is.
To turn distribution into a habit, tether every release to a story type: performance milestone, integration, design decision, governance update, outage post-mortem with learnings. Each story type has a template and a target audience. Standardize the template, and you’ll stop reinventing the wheel every time you ship.
A minimal PR stack for small teams (2–8 people)
- Single-source narrative doc (1 page): Problem frame, who hurts, why now, your claim, three proof points, and a 50-word “how it works.” Treat it like an internal README for your story.
- Evidence kit: Benchmarks (with scripts), a reference architecture diagram, short video demo, and one signed case study—even if it’s a design partner.
- Message map: For each audience (users, contributors, buyers, analysts), 1 core message + 2 supporting lines + 1 clarifying “what we are not.”
- Releasable artifacts: Blog template, 90-second demo script, press note template, conference CF(P) boilerplate, and a “how to replicate our results” gist.
- Borrowed trust: Two to three high-quality third-party profiles (e.g., a respected directory, a marketplace page, a neutral explainer such as this breakdown of strategic PR for startups).
- Calendar cadence: One external story per sprint: ship notes + one proof point + one distribution action (podcast pitch, partner blog, or community thread).
Build this once; iterate quarterly. It’s the devops of reputation.
Make journalists’ jobs easy
Editors assign stories that are timely, relevant, and verifiable. When you pitch, lead with a current event or number (e.g., “Postgres 17 adds X; here’s what that unlocks for event-sourced systems and why our open-source adapter matters”). Link your evidence kit. Offer a 15-minute briefing with screenshare and a concrete user to talk to. Then—this is the part most teams skip—suggest an angle that serves the outlet’s readers, not your vanity metric.
If you’re unsure what “good” looks like, study concise, practitioner-oriented explainers. Even a lightweight third-party profile, such as TechWaves company profile, demonstrates how to keep facts straight and scannable.
What to measure (so you don’t become a vanity-metric zombie)
- Time to trust: From first touch (newsletter signup, GitHub star, trial) to the first meaningful action (deploy to staging, open PR, request a security review).
- Proof engagement: Views and forks of your benchmark repo, replication attempts, issues opened about the test harness—these correlate with serious evaluation.
- Decision-maker resonance: Replies from target buyer titles, accepted conference talks in the right tracks, analyst briefings converted to mentions.
- Compounding mentions: How many third-party references cite you without your prompting? (Set up lightweight media monitoring and manual sampling.)
If a number doesn’t change how you operate, don’t track it.
A 90-day field plan you can actually follow
Days 1–10: Codify the narrative. Pull your founders, lead engineer, and PM into a 90-minute workshop. Write the single-page narrative doc and message map. Identify your proof gaps: where do you need a test harness, a user quote, or a diagram?
Days 11–30: Build the evidence kit. Ship the demo video. Publish the benchmark (with scripts). Write one case study (real numbers, real constraints). Draft the “we are not” note—surprisingly powerful for winning trust.
Days 31–60: Ship and distribute. Pick one story type (integration, design decision, or milestone). Publish it on your blog, then tailor a 300-word pitch for two journalists, one community newsletter, and one podcast. Offer a hands-on demo.
Days 61–90: Speak and systematize. Submit one talk, run one webinar, and document your PR runbook in your repo’s /docs/public-relations.md so anyone on the team can repeat the process without heroics.
Common failure modes (and the fix)
- Overclaiming. If it only works for a narrow workload, say so. Niche honesty travels farther than fuzzy universals.
- Product-first pitches. Editors need context. Tie your release to an external change—standards, pricing shifts, a deprecation timeline.
- Evidence locked behind meetings. If someone has to “hop on a call” to see proof, you don’t have proof. Publish the artifacts.
- Outsourcing the brain. Consultants can help, but they can’t replace your technical clarity. Keep the narrative doc owned by the builders.
For solo founders and tiny teams
You don’t need a huge budget to look legitimate. You need consistency and clarity. One strong article that teaches something real, one reproducible benchmark, and one honest case study will do more than a dozen vague blog posts. If you need a starting reference, skim Strategic PR as a growth tool again and map each idea to a concrete artifact in your repo or Notion.
Top comments (0)