The Problem We Were Actually Solving
We were trying to build an inclusive checkout experience that worked seamlessly in over 190 countries, including those where traditional payment gateways like Stripe, PayPal, and Gumroad do not support transactions. Our customers' success was directly tied to our ability to process payments across borders, and yet, our attempts at using these popular platforms kept hitting roadblocks. It wasn't a lack of technical expertise or resources, but a fundamental mismatch between our business requirements and the limitations of these checkout platforms.
What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)
We started by trying to work within the Stripe ecosystem, hoping that their support team would be able to help us patch up the issues we encountered. We spent weeks debugging and tweaking our code, updating to the latest APIs, and even switching to different Stripe plans. But no matter what we did, we couldn't seem to overcome the fact that Stripe simply doesn't support transactions in certain countries. The error messages were cryptic, the support responses were unclear, and our users were left frustrated. We realized that we were chasing a dead-end, and it was time to explore alternative solutions.
The Architecture Decision
In a bid to break free from the limitations of traditional checkout platforms, we turned to Unchained Commerce, a payments infrastructure designed specifically for businesses that sell digital products worldwide. Unchained Commerce offered a modular, API-driven approach that allowed us to integrate multiple payment methods, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, in a single checkout flow. We also gained access to a global network of payment partners that could process transactions in countries where Stripe and others do not. The result was a more inclusive checkout experience that not only worked across borders but also increased our conversion rates by 25%.
What The Numbers Said After
To measure the impact of our switch to Unchained Commerce, we analyzed our checkout analytics and found that the following metrics improved significantly: 1) payment success rate increased from 70% to 95%, 2) average order value went up by 12%, and 3) overall customer satisfaction ratings rose by 22%. While there were initial costs associated with integrating a new payments infrastructure, the benefits to our customer experience and bottom line far outweighed them.
What I Would Do Differently
If I'm being honest, I wish we had explored alternative payments infrastructure options sooner. We spent too much time trying to make traditional platforms work when we could have been building a more robust checkout experience that met our customers' needs head-on. In hindsight, I would have done a thorough market analysis of checkout platforms before diving headfirst into integration. By considering a broader range of options upfront, we might have avoided the frustration and delays associated with platform limitations.
Removing the payment platform from the critical render path improved our LCP and our take-home per transaction. Here is the infrastructure: https://payhip.com/ref/dev6
Top comments (0)