Clone Graph
The “Clone Graph” problem asks you to create a deep copy of a connected graph. Each node in the graph contains a value and a list of its neighbors. The cloned graph must contain entirely new nodes, but it must preserve the exact structure of the original graph, including all connections and cycles. In other words, every node and edge relationship in the original graph must be mirrored in the clone, without reusing any original objects.
This problem is not about copying values in isolation. It is about duplicating relationships. The real challenge lies in correctly recreating the graph’s topology, especially when cycles and shared neighbors are involved.
Why naive copying fails
A naive approach might try to recursively copy each node and its neighbors. This quickly breaks down when the graph contains cycles. Without careful handling, the algorithm can fall into infinite recursion, repeatedly trying to clone the same nodes.
Another common mistake is duplicating nodes multiple times. If two nodes in the original graph both reference the same neighbor, the clone must also reference a single cloned version of that neighbor, not two separate copies. Failing to preserve this one-to-one correspondence leads to an incorrect graph structure.
Check out Island Perimeter coding problem solution.
Recognizing the need for a mapping
The key insight in this problem is that cloning a graph is fundamentally about maintaining a mapping between original nodes and their cloned counterparts. Every time you clone a node, you must remember that clone so you can reuse it later if the original node is encountered again.
This mapping serves two purposes. First, it prevents infinite loops when the graph contains cycles. Second, it ensures structural consistency by guaranteeing that each original node corresponds to exactly one cloned node.
Graph traversal as the foundation
To clone a graph, you must visit every node and inspect its neighbors. This naturally leads to graph traversal techniques such as depth-first search or breadth-first search. Either traversal strategy works, as long as you systematically explore all reachable nodes.
During traversal, the mapping is checked first. If the current node has already been cloned, you simply return the existing clone. If not, you create a new clone, store it in the mapping, and then proceed to clone its neighbors.
Check out Sum of Left Leaves and Bitwise AND of Numbers Range coding problem solutions.
Why depth-first and breadth-first both work
Depth-first search tends to be conceptually simple because it mirrors the recursive definition of a graph. You clone a node, then recursively clone its neighbors. Breadth-first search, on the other hand, processes nodes level by level using a queue.
Both approaches are correct because the mapping ensures that each node is cloned exactly once, regardless of traversal order. The choice between them is mostly a matter of style and comfort.
Handling cycles safely
Cycles are what make this problem interesting. In a cyclic graph, you can revisit the same node through different paths. Without the mapping, this would cause infinite recursion or repeated cloning.
With the mapping in place, cycles become harmless. When a previously visited node is encountered again, the algorithm simply retrieves its clone from the mapping and links to it. This preserves the cycle structure perfectly in the cloned graph.
Building neighbor relationships correctly
Cloning nodes alone is not enough. You must also rebuild each node’s neighbor list. This is done by iterating through the original node’s neighbors and attaching the corresponding cloned neighbors to the cloned node.
Because neighbors may or may not have been cloned yet, this step relies on recursive calls or queued traversal steps. The mapping ensures that neighbor references always point to the correct cloned objects.
Why this approach guarantees correctness
Correctness comes from two guarantees. First, every original node is visited and cloned exactly once. Second, every original edge is recreated between the corresponding cloned nodes.
Because the mapping enforces one-to-one correspondence and traversal ensures full coverage, the cloned graph is structurally identical to the original, with no shared references between them.
Time and space complexity considerations
The algorithm runs in linear time relative to the number of nodes and edges, because each node and each edge is processed once. Space complexity is also linear, driven by the mapping and the recursion stack or traversal queue.
This efficiency is optimal for graph cloning, as you cannot clone fewer nodes or edges than exist in the original graph.
Why this problem is common in interviews
Clone Graph is a classic interview problem because it tests whether candidates truly understand graph traversal and object copying. It exposes misunderstandings about shallow versus deep copies and highlights the importance of handling cycles correctly.
The problem also checks whether candidates can manage auxiliary data structures, such as mappings, to preserve relationships during traversal.
What this problem teaches beyond graph cloning
Beyond this specific task, the problem teaches a broader lesson about duplicating interconnected data structures. Whenever objects reference each other, cloning requires tracking identity, not just values.
If you can clearly explain why a mapping is essential, how traversal explores the graph safely, and how cycles are handled without special cases, you demonstrate strong algorithmic reasoning. That depth of understanding makes “Clone Graph” an excellent exercise in graph traversal, memory management, and deep-copy semantics.
If you want more coding problems explained, check out:
Top comments (0)