DEV Community

Cover image for Practical Developer Wisdom You Cannot Google Easily
Tech Stratos
Tech Stratos

Posted on

Practical Developer Wisdom You Cannot Google Easily

Most developer advice sounds helpful until you actually try to use it.

Google can tell you how to use a framework, optimize a query, or fix an error message. What it cannot tell you is how software survives real teams, real deadlines, and real people.

This is the kind of stuff I only learned by messing things up repeatedly.

Here is the developer wisdom I wish someone had told me earlier.


Clean code matters less than understandable code

Early in my career, I chased elegance. Short functions. Clever abstractions. Beautiful patterns.

Then someone else had to maintain my code.

What I learned is that most bugs are not caused by messy code. They are caused by code that is too smart for its own good. The best code is not the cleanest. It is the one a tired developer can understand at 3 a.m. without context.

If a junior developer cannot follow it without a walkthrough, it is probably too complex.


Most bugs come from assumptions, not syntax

When something breaks in production, it is rarely because you forgot a semicolon or misused an API.

It is usually because you assumed:

  • This value will never be null
  • This function will always return fast
  • This endpoint will not be called that way
  • This data will stay small

The more confident you are about an assumption, the more dangerous it is. Defensive coding is not paranoia. It is respect for reality.


Code reviews are about people, not just code

I used to think code reviews were about catching mistakes.

They are not.

Good code reviews are about:

  • Sharing context
  • Teaching patterns
  • Aligning mental models
  • Preventing knowledge silos

If a review only says “looks good” or nitpicks formatting, it failed. If it helps someone understand why a decision was made, it succeeded.


Productivity is about energy, not hours

There was a time when I believed the best developers just worked longer.

That belief burned me out.

What actually matters is:

  • Focus
  • Recovery
  • Mental clarity

Two hours of deep work beats eight hours of distracted effort. If your output keeps dropping, the solution is usually rest, not discipline.


Shipping something imperfect beats polishing nothing

Perfection feels productive. It is often just fear wearing a nicer outfit.

I have seen countless features delayed because they were not “ready yet.” Most of them never shipped. The ones that did ship imperfectly got real feedback and improved fast.

Users forgive rough edges. They do not forgive silence.


Technical debt is not the enemy. Unacknowledged debt is

All systems accumulate technical debt. That is normal.

The real danger is pretending it does not exist.

The healthiest teams I have worked with:

  • Name their debt
  • Track it
  • Decide consciously when to accept it

Debt becomes toxic only when it is hidden.


The best developers ask better questions, not just better answers

Junior developers often hesitate to ask questions because they do not want to look inexperienced.

Senior developers ask questions constantly.

They ask:

  • Why was this built this way
  • What problem are we actually solving
  • What happens if this fails
  • Who depends on this behavior

Questions reveal understanding gaps before bugs do.


Tools matter less than habits

People love debating frameworks, editors, and languages.

In practice, what matters more is:

  • How often you refactor
  • How you name things
  • How you document decisions
  • How you test assumptions
  • How you communicate tradeoffs

Great habits on average tools outperform bad habits on great tools every time.


The longer you work in tech, the more boring your solutions become

This surprised me.

As I gained experience, I stopped reaching for clever solutions. I started choosing boring ones. Stable ones. Predictable ones.

It turns out boring code scales better. It survives team changes. It fails in understandable ways.

Complexity is easy to add and very hard to remove.


Final thought

You can learn syntax, frameworks, and patterns from Google.

You learn judgment by shipping code, breaking things, fixing them, and doing it again.

That kind of wisdom does not show up in search results. It shows up after you have been wrong a few times and paid attention.

If you have been there too, you already know this is true.

Top comments (3)

Collapse
 
coachmariamaria profile image
Dantes Rivera

I appreciate that this does not talk down to junior developers. It feels supportive.

Collapse
 
harcel1988 profile image
Cel

I like how this validates that learning in tech is messy and non linear. That is rarely talked about.

Collapse
 
zsazsag profile image
Zsa

It is nice to see developer content that is calm and thoughtful instead of loud and hype driven.