Picture from Lance Grandahl
In GitHub, whether you want to improve merge velocity, test interdependent changes or setup some sort of releasing model, you could be interested in grouping code changes.
It is called "bundling" or "combining" pull requests.
It allows multiple pull requests to be built and tested together (in CI) and qualified together (e.g. pre-production deployment with shadow traffic).
In order to achieve this easily, you would need some automation. You're lucky, I'm going to share an elegant solution to solve this.
(before we continue, also think about GitHub merge queues)
Demo!
I have 2 pull requests (from forks) targeting main
. They have passed minimal tests running on PR but I now would like to run long and consuming tests together. I also want to check they work well together without merging first one of them to main
(or to a release branch).
My plan for the two following changes is to target the next release v2.3
, so I added a label v2.3
to the pull requests:
In order to trigger the bundle creation, I create the branch v2.3
from main
Once I finished to create branch, it already started to run an action:
After seconds, the run is finished:
A new pull requests (targeting main
) appeared:
The pull requests contains well the 2 pull requests changes (and branch v2.3
was updated):
Later, when the bundled pull request will be merged, the combined pull requests will be automatically merged:
Hello "combine-pull-requests"
This magic can happen thanks to the great combine-pull-requests 🎉
Thank you Bob van der Linden for this 👍 🚀
This GitHub action makes it deadly simple to combine multiple pull requests based on their labels.
My preferred workflow consists in triggering bundle by branch creation (but you can use other events) then push and open a pull request to main
.
I know you want to see the code, please find below my setup:
name: Combine
on: create
permissions: write-all
jobs:
combine:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: ${{ github.event.ref_type == 'branch'}}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: bobvanderlinden/combine-pull-requests@master
with:
label: ${{ github.event.ref }}
repo-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Push changes
uses: ad-m/github-push-action@master
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
branch: ${{ github.event.ref }}
- name: Create pull request
uses: devops-infra/action-pull-request@v0.4.1
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
title: "[${{ github.event.ref }}] combined!"
body: ""
source_branch: ${{ github.event.ref }}
target_branch: main
template: .github/BUNDLE_TEMPLATE.md
label: "bundle
Then you would probably put your build-test-deployment... at the end of this same workflow.
Or you can leave the responsibility to another workflow. There's various manners to differentiate the bundle from other pull requests, for instance you can filter the label bundle
.
To give you an example on how you would run/skip a workflow based on PR having the label bundle
:
on:
pull_request:
types:
- opened
jobs:
run_if:
if: contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'bundle')
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "This is a bundle, run more tests"
What else?
What if I pushed a new commit to one of the pull request? Just need to delete and recreate branch v2.3
. Same procedure applies if I want to add or remove a pull request from the bundle.
Customize to your needs, you can listen to more events than only on: create
😇
Another great thing with labels is that same pull request can belong to multiple bundles 🔥
Conclusion
You should design tooling and branching model that suits you the best, so maybe this is not for you, but I really like how elegant is this workflow and I needed to share.
I hope you can also find it useful for you.
Then, now it only remains for me to wish you "happy hacking!" 😁
Top comments (0)