By Oliver Otto, TimeSpin GmbH
1. Introduction: The Ritual of the Lost Hour
Twice a year, Europe performs a ritual that seems routine but leaves deep social and economic traces — the time change.
At the end of March, the clock is set forward one hour — daylight saving time begins. At the end of October, it’s set back again. Millions of alarm clocks, smartwatches, servers, and time-tracking systems adjust automatically.
What seems like a small shift in daily life is, in truth, a complex interplay of technology, politics, and biology.
Yet globally, Europe is now in the minority. More and more countries are abolishing the time change — for health, technical, or simply practical reasons.
2. Historical Origins: A Relic from the Energy Crisis
The idea of changing the clock was born out of scarcity.
During World War I, Germany and Austria-Hungary introduced daylight saving time in 1916 to save energy by making better use of daylight. The logic was simple: if it stays bright longer in the evening, people use less artificial light.
But as numerous studies later showed, the expected energy savings never really materialized. Modern lighting, efficient appliances, and flexible working hours have long rendered the original rationale obsolete.
Today, more than a century later, it’s mostly political routine — not economic sense — that keeps the time change alive.
3. Europe Debates – Other Countries Take Action
3.1 Countries Without Time Change
While the European Union continues to debate, other nations have long since acted:
Iceland has not changed its clocks for decades. Given its location near the Arctic Circle, switching times makes little sense — it’s almost always bright in summer and dark in winter.
Russia, Belarus, and Turkey all adopted permanent time zones in the 2010s.
Greenland followed suit in 2023, except for the U.S. base Thule, which follows the American schedule.
Morocco stays on daylight saving time year-round, pausing only during Ramadan.
Ukraine also passed a law to abolish the change in 2025 — but President Zelenskyy has yet to sign it.
3.2 The EU: Stuck in Perpetual Disagreement
In 2019, the European Union officially voted to abolish the time change. A strong majority of the European Parliament supported the move.
But to this day, the member states can’t agree on whether to keep summer or winter time permanently.
Without a unified approach, Europe risks a chaotic patchwork of time zones — a nightmare for logistics, IT systems, flight schedules, and cross-border work.
Germany leans toward winter time, Spain toward summer — an incompatible situation both economically and technically.
4. The Human Factor: When the Inner Clock Trips
4.1 Sleep and Health
Changing between summer and winter time isn’t just about moving the clock hands — it interferes with our circadian rhythm, the body’s internal clock.
Sleep researchers describe it as a mini jet lag. Studies show that especially after the spring shift, rates of heart attacks, depressive moods, and concentration problems increase.
Children and shift workers are hit the hardest; their bodies often take days to reestablish a stable sleep-wake rhythm.
4.2 Performance Loss and Economic Costs
Economically, the benefit is also questionable.
According to the German Society for Sleep Research and Sleep Medicine, millions of productive work hours are lost every year due to the time change.
Fatigue, errors, and even traffic accidents spike noticeably.
The OECD estimates the total economic damage at billions of euros — with no measurable benefit in return.
5. Technology in Transition: When Software Misreads Time
5.1 Automatic Adjustments — A Risk for Systems
In our interconnected world, the time change is anything but trivial.
Servers, time-tracking devices, cloud services, and production systems all synchronize across time zones.
If even one system misinterprets the time, it can cause major issues: incorrect bookings, payroll errors, distorted sensor readings, or duplicate time entries.
Even modern smartphones can briefly display the wrong time if network operators and device manufacturers aren’t perfectly synchronized.
5.2 Relevance to the Modern Workplace
In digital work environments — hybrid teams, international projects, and automated time tracking — the biannual switch consistently causes problems.
Time-tracking systems must correctly interpret timestamps, even when an hour “repeats” (as it does when clocks are set back in October).
A single misread timestamp can disrupt entire monthly reports.
6. The Role of Smart Time Tracking: What Companies Can Do
This is where modern time tracking solutions like TimeSpin come into play.
The system combines a physical cube with a cloud-based analytics platform.
Unlike traditional software, TimeSpin automatically detects time changes and interprets time zones correctly — even across hybrid or remote work models.
This eliminates common errors caused by time shifts: duplicate entries, negative work hours, or incorrect break calculations.
Additionally, TimeSpin helps companies generate transparent evaluations — regardless of whether it’s summer or winter time.
Time tracking becomes not only technically robust but also legally compliant.
7. Energy, Environment, and New Arguments Against the Old System
The original goal of saving energy no longer holds true.
According to Germany’s Federal Network Agency, the savings are less than 0.3% of annual energy consumption.
Even though less lighting is used in the evening, heating costs rise in the morning — canceling out any gain.
Given modern energy policy, smart building automation, and carbon pricing, the time change now looks like an anachronism — a bureaucratic relic of a bygone era.
8. Psychological Aspects: Time, Perception, and Well-Being
Time isn’t just physical — it’s psychological. People perceive light, routine, and daily rhythm as stabilizing factors.
The biannual disruption breaks that stability. Many report listlessness, mood swings, or the feeling of being “out of sync.”
In Scandinavian countries, policymakers recognized early on that a stable daily rhythm may be more valuable for mental well-being than theoretical energy savings — an idea increasingly gaining traction across Europe.
9. Economic Perspective: The Cost of Indecision
Every switch requires effort: IT systems must be updated, work schedules adjusted, and production plans recalculated.
In Germany alone, the estimated cost exceeds €400 million annually, caused by coordination issues, human error, and administrative workload.
For globally active companies, there’s an added stress factor: meetings with the U.S., Turkey, or Iceland suddenly shift by an hour for weeks.
This creates confusion and forces recalibration of calendars, time-tracking systems, and communication tools.
10. Conclusion: Europe in a Time Loop
While Iceland, Russia, and Morocco have long embraced permanent time systems, the EU keeps debating — without progress.
The time change has become a symbol of indecision, out of touch with both technological reality and social sentiment.
A permanent time zone — whether summer or winter — would be a liberating step for the economy, public health, and everyday life alike.
11. Rethinking Time Tracking: TimeSpin as a Symbol of Modern Time Culture
In a world where work is increasingly digital, flexible, and global, precise time tracking is more important than ever.
The question is no longer whether we move the clock — but how consciously we manage our time.
TimeSpin stands for a new culture of time awareness:
simple, tactile time capture,
intelligent synchronization across time zones,
transparent analytics — independent of daylight saving or standard time.
If Europe still insists on changing the clock, companies can at least learn to handle it intelligently.
12. Outlook: When Will the Clock-Turning Finally End?
Whether and when the EU will make a final decision remains uncertain.
But the arguments are clear: the health, organizational, and technical costs far outweigh the benefits.
Until then, we’ll keep hearing the same familiar reminder twice a year:
“Don’t forget to change the clock.”
Maybe soon, that will be a thing of the past — and that would truly be progress.
Top comments (0)