Almost everyone who sits a CompTIA exam reads their score report the same way. Find the number, compare it to the cut score, feel something, close the window. On a pass that is fair enough. On a fail it throws away the most useful thing CompTIA will ever hand you for free.
The report does not stop at the number. Under the pass or fail line it says this:
You incorrectly answered one or more questions in the following objective areas:
Then it lists them. Not "Domain 4, Security Operations." The actual numbered objectives with their full titles, the same numbers that appear in the exam objectives document. On a Security+ report that looks like 2.4, 3.1, 4.5 and so on, each with its one line description. I have now seen this on SY0-701 reports and on A+ Core 1 reports, so it is the CompTIA report format generally rather than a Security+ quirk.
That list is a study plan somebody else wrote for you.
What it changes about a retake
Walk into a retake without reading it and your plan is "study harder." Five domains, ninety odd objectives, and no idea which parts actually cost you the exam. Most people respond by rewatching the videos they already understood, because that feels like studying and it is comfortable.
Read it and the plan is different. You have three or four objective numbers. Open the exam objectives PDF, which CompTIA gives away, find those numbers, and look at the sub bullets underneath each one. That is now the whole list of things you need to close. Everything else on the exam you already demonstrated you can do.
The reason it works is that the objectives document is not marketing copy. Every question on the exam maps to a line in it. So an objective number on your score report and a heading in that PDF refer to the same body of material, and the intersection is small enough to actually finish.
The number itself lies to you a little
Security+ passes at 750 on a scale of 100 to 900. That is not 83 percent, and it is not a percentage at all. It is a scaled score, which means the raw count of questions you got right has already been run through a conversion that accounts for the difficulty of the particular form you sat.
Two consequences people get wrong constantly.
First, you cannot work backwards to a question count. Every forum thread has somebody saying "I was three questions off." They do not know that. Nobody knows that. The mapping from raw to scaled is not published and it is not linear.
Second, the distance between your score and the cut is not a distance in questions either. A 723 against a 750 cut is closer than it feels, but closer here means closer in the scaled space, not twenty seven questions.
The same applies elsewhere. A+ Core 1 passes at 675 on 900, Network+ at 720 on 900. Different cuts, same scale, same trap.
Where the report goes quiet
It tells you the objective. It does not tell you the format.
If you lost points inside a performance based question, the report attributes that to whatever objective the PBQ covered. So you can see 1.4 and correctly conclude you are shaky on cryptographic solutions, while the actual failure was that you had never manipulated a drag to match interface under time pressure and burned six minutes on the first one.
That is worth knowing because the fix is different. An objective gap is closed by reading. A format gap is closed by doing the format until it is boring. If your report lists objectives you feel reasonably confident about, that mismatch is the signal, and the honest read is usually that the format cost you rather than the content.
The short version
- Open your score report and scroll past the number.
- Write down the objective numbers it lists.
- Find each one in the exam objectives PDF and study the sub bullets under it, nothing else.
- Stop trying to convert your scaled score into a question count.
- If the listed objectives are ones you thought you knew, suspect the format rather than the material.
CompTIA hands you a personalised gap analysis after every attempt and charges nothing for it. It is the cheapest thing in the whole certification process and it is the piece people skip.
For the free material: the exam objectives PDF comes straight from CompTIA's Security+ page, Professor Messer's SY0-701 course is on YouTube for nothing, and Jason Dion's practice tests are worth the sale price. Full disclosure on this last one, it is mine. I sat SY0-701 in August and passed, and I built the site I studied on. The performance based question simulator on it is free with no account, which is the piece I could not find anywhere else when I was preparing: Security+ PBQ practice.
Top comments (0)