PHP has long been a polarizing language in web development. For decades, it has faced criticism from developers for various reasons, many of which are well-documented in discussions and articles online. Some of the main points of frustration historically include:
- Inconsistent language design: PHP evolved rapidly and organically, leading to functions with inconsistent naming conventions, parameter orders, and behavior. This made learning and maintaining code challenging.
- Security concerns: Older PHP codebases often suffered from vulnerabilities like SQL injection, XSS, and CSRF, largely due to improper defaults and the prevalence of copy-pasted examples online.
- Legacy code and technical debt: Because PHP has been around for so long, many projects are burdened by years of spaghetti code, making them difficult to refactor or modernize.
- Overexposure of “bad examples”: Many public tutorials and early projects promoted poor coding practices, creating a reputation that PHP is inherently messy or unsafe.
These criticisms are valid in the historical context. PHP’s early days were chaotic, and many developers were frustrated by the need to manage too much low-level boilerplate code. It often felt like developers were fighting the language as much as they were writing applications.
However, the story of PHP today is very different. Modern PHP frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, and CakePHP provide structure, enforce best practices, and reduce boilerplate, making it easier to write clean, maintainable, and secure code. Features like type declarations, namespaces, improved error handling, and Composer-based package management have brought PHP closer to modern development standards.
The persistence of PHP in powering millions of websites—including some of the world’s largest platforms—shows that despite its reputation, it remains a practical and effective tool when used with modern conventions. What used to be a chaotic ecosystem of scripts and ad-hoc coding has evolved into a robust environment with frameworks, dependency management, testing tools, and a large, supportive community.
In short, the hate for PHP is often rooted in its past, not its present. While older projects may still suffer from bad design or outdated practices, new PHP systems are increasingly structured, maintainable, and secure. Understanding this evolution helps contextualize both the criticism and the ongoing value of PHP in modern web development.
Must read articles about this for further information:
— Usman Zahid
Top comments (0)