Vercel is often recommended as the default choice for small projects.
The logic sounds reasonable. Fast deployments, no servers to manage, a generous free tier, and a clean developer experience. For side projects or early experiments, it feels like an easy win.
We thought the same.
But after working with both platforms, we realized something important. Even for small projects, Kuberns turned out to be the better choice from the very beginning, not after hitting limits, not after scaling problems, but from the first deployment.
Small Projects Still Need Real Infrastructure
A small project does not mean a simple application.
Even small apps usually include:
- A backend API
- Some form of background work or scheduled jobs
- External integrations
- Consistent performance
- Predictable costs
Vercel works best when your project fits neatly into a frontend and serverless-only model. The moment you step slightly outside that boundary, usage limits start shaping how you build.
You begin thinking about:
- Function execution time
- Cold starts
- Request limits
- Bandwidth usage
- Whether logic should live on Vercel at all
That is already too much overhead for a small project.
With Kuberns, even small projects are treated as full applications. You deploy once, and deployment, monitoring, scaling, and optimization are handled automatically without hidden constraints.
Vercel Usage Limits Appear Earlier Than Expected
Vercel’s limits are not obvious on day one, but they surface quickly.
Even small applications can run into:
- Serverless execution limits
- Build minute restrictions
- Bandwidth-related costs
- Team-based pricing boundaries
These limits rarely block you immediately. Instead, they influence decisions quietly. You simplify features, avoid certain patterns, or move parts of your app elsewhere just to stay within comfort zones.
That friction shows up much earlier than most teams expect.
With Kuberns, there are no artificial usage ceilings forcing architectural compromises. Small projects run the same way large ones do, without hidden thresholds waiting to surprise you later.
Monitoring and Scaling Should Not Be Extra Work
On Vercel, monitoring becomes something you actively manage.
You check dashboards.
You watch usage graphs.
You keep an eye on which routes or functions consume the most resources.
That might be acceptable, but it is still work.
On Kuberns, monitoring and scaling happen in the background. You do not configure them. You do not babysit them. If traffic increases, the platform adapts automatically. If usage drops, it scales down without intervention.
That simplicity is valuable even when the project is small.
Small Projects Grow More Often Than You Expect
Most projects do not start with a plan to scale.
They begin as experiments, internal tools, or side projects. But growth often happens unexpectedly. When it does, Vercel’s usage model becomes something you need to rethink.
You either redesign parts of your application or start moving services elsewhere.
With Kuberns, there is nothing to rethink. The same platform that works for a small project continues to work as it grows. You do not outgrow it. It grows with you.
Cost Predictability Matters From Day One
Vercel’s pricing looks friendly early on, but costs are tied to many different usage dimensions. Even modest traffic increases can change your bill in ways that are hard to predict.
Small projects benefit just as much from predictable pricing as large ones.
Because Kuberns runs on optimized AWS infrastructure and focuses on reducing waste automatically, costs scale in a more transparent and predictable way. You are not penalized for normal usage patterns.
Why We Chose Kuberns From the Start
We did not move to Kuberns after hitting limits.
We chose Kuberns because it removed limits from the beginning.
No serverless constraints.
No fragmented tooling.
No usage ceilings shaping architecture.
No constant dashboard watching.
Deployment, monitoring, scaling, and optimization were handled automatically, even for small projects.
That made Kuberns the better choice immediately, not eventually.
Final Thoughts
Vercel is often positioned as the ideal platform for small projects.
But if you want a platform that treats small projects seriously, without hidden constraints or future rewrites, Kuberns is the better option from day one.
If you are evaluating Vercel or already questioning its limits, this breakdown of
the best Vercel alternatives for real applications
is worth reading before you commit.
The best platform is not the one that works only while things are small.
It is the one that never forces you to change how you build.
Top comments (0)