Most AI-assisted coding sessions look productive at first. Then the codebase collapses under its own weight. Context dilution, architectural drift, and bloated files quickly turn into more debugging than building.
The Core Problems
AI systems excel at generating functional code but struggle with architectural consistency. Common issues include:
- Functions that work but lack structure
- Code repetition across components
- Architecture degrading across multiple sessions
- Output quality falling as context grows
The Approach
The Disciplined AI Software Development Methodology applies four stages with measurable constraints:
1. AI Configuration – Define boundaries and require uncertainty flagging
2. Collaborative Planning – Break projects into phases and document edge cases
3. Systematic Implementation – ≤150-line file limit enforces modularity
4. Data-Driven Iteration – Benchmarking first, optimization later
Key Constraints
File size limits enforce modular thinking and easier debugging.
Core requirements mandate CI/CD, testing, and benchmarking before application code.
Architectural compliance validates separation of concerns, DRY principles, and performance gates systematically.
Uncertainty flagging requires AI to surface unknowns instead of guessing.
Why It Works
AI handles focused tasks well. "Implement the auth module" works better than sprawling requests. By enforcing structure and measurable outputs, this methodology transforms development from "request everything, debug later" into "plan systematically, implement incrementally, validate continuously."
Full methodology, examples, and tooling: Disciplined AI Collaboration
What problems have you run into with AI-assisted development? How do you enforce code quality across sessions?
Top comments (0)