DEV Community

Cover image for DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1: Which AI Reasoning Model Dominates in 2025?
VISDOM 04
VISDOM 04

Posted on

1

DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1: Which AI Reasoning Model Dominates in 2025?

DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 are leading examples of a new generation of large language models (LLMs) that go beyond simple text generation and prioritize complex reasoning capabilities. These models have garnered significant attention for their ability to tackle intricate problems in various domains, including mathematics, coding, and general knowledge. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of DeepSeek-R1 vs OpenAI o1, delving into their architecture, training methodologies, capabilities, limitations, and potential use cases.

DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1: How Does DeepSeek-R1 Work?

DeepSeek-R1 utilizes a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach, activating only 37 billion of its 671 billion parameters for each token processed. This efficient design allows the model to deliver high performance without the computational overhead typically associated with models of this scale (Technical Paper). Furthermore, DeepSeek-R1 employs a Chain of Thought (CoT) approach, generating a series of reasoning steps before arriving at the final answer. This enhances the model’s accuracy and provides valuable insights into its decision-making process. With a maximum context length of 128,000 tokens, DeepSeek-R1 can effectively handle complex, multi-step reasoning tasks.

DeepSeek has also released six smaller distilled models derived from DeepSeek-R1, with the 32B and 70B parameter versions demonstrating competitive performance (Hugging Face Models). This allows for more efficient deployment and broader accessibility of the model’s reasoning capabilities.

DeepSeek-R1’s training involves a multi-stage pipeline that combines reinforcement learning (RL) with supervised fine-tuning (SFT). This represents a significant departure from traditional training methods and a potential breakthrough in AI research. Instead of relying heavily on curated examples for supervised learning, DeepSeek-R1 learns to reason through pure reinforcement learning. The model starts with a “cold-start” phase using carefully selected data and then undergoes multi-stage RL, which refines its reasoning abilities and improves the readability of its outputs. This approach allows the model to develop a deeper understanding of the underlying logic and problem-solving strategies (Training Pipeline Details).

OpenAI o1 Architecture

OpenAI o1 also leverages chain-of-thought reasoning, enabling it to decompose problems systematically and explore multiple solution paths. OpenAI o1 models are new large language models trained with reinforcement learning to perform complex reasoning. A key architectural feature of o1 is its sophisticated three-tier instruction system. Each level in this hierarchy has explicit priority over the levels below, which helps prevent conflicts and enhances the model’s resistance to manipulation attempts. This hierarchical approach, combined with the model’s ability to understand context and intent, suggests a future where AI systems can reason about their actions and consequences, potentially leading to genuinely thoughtful artificial intelligence.

OpenAI o1’s training heavily relies on RL combined with chain-of-thought reasoning. This approach enables the model to “think” through problems step-by-step before generating a response, significantly improving its performance on tasks that require logic, math, and technical expertise. The training process involves guiding the model along optimal reasoning paths, allowing it to recognize and correct errors, break down complex steps into simpler ones, and refine its problem-solving strategies (OpenAI o1 Documentation).

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Its Impact

Both DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 utilize chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning as a core element of their architecture and training. This approach involves generating a series of intermediate reasoning steps before arriving at a final answer. CoT reasoning enhances the transparency of the models’ decision-making processes and allows users to understand the logic behind their responses. This is particularly valuable in applications where explainability and trustworthiness are crucial, such as education, research, and complex decision-making.

DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1: Benchmark Performance

DeepSeek-R1’s 97.3% MATH-500 Accuracy vs. OpenAI o1’s 96.4%

Image description

Key Takeaways:

Mathematical Reasoning: DeepSeek-R1 dominates with 97.3% accuracy on MATH-500, slightly outperforming OpenAI o1 (96.4%).
Coding: DeepSeek-R1 achieves a 96.3 percentile on Codeforces (vs. o1’s 89 percentile), demonstrating expert-level programming skills.
Factual Knowledge: OpenAI o1 leads in MMLU (91.8%) and GPQA Diamond (75.7%), showing stronger general knowledge.

DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1: Why DeepSeek Costs $0.14/M Tokens vs OpenAI’s $7.5

DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1

DeepSeek Costs $0.14/M Tokens vs OpenAI’s $7.5

Image description

DeepSeek-R1 offers a significantly more cost-effective solution compared to OpenAI o1. DeepSeek-R1’s API pricing follows a tiered structure (Pricing Page), with costs varying based on factors such as cache hits and output token usage. For instance, the cost for 1 million input tokens ranges from $0.14 for cache hits to $0.55 for cache misses, while the cost for 1 million output tokens is $2.19.

In contrast, OpenAI o1’s pricing is considerably higher (OpenAI Pricing). Input costs range from $15 to $16.50 per million tokens, and output costs can reach $60 to $66 per million tokens. This substantial price difference makes DeepSeek-R1 a more attractive option for users and developers seeking cost-efficient reasoning capabilities.

DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1: When to Choose OpenAI o1 Over DeepSeek-R1

While both DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 exhibit impressive capabilities, they also have limitations:

DeepSeek-R1 Limitations

Occasional Timeouts and Errors: May produce invalid SQL queries or timeouts under heavy loads.
Sensitivity to Prompts: Performance varies with prompt phrasing.
Language Support: Optimized for English and Chinese; weaker in other languages.

OpenAI o1 Limitations

Shorter Context Length: Limited to 128K tokens (vs. DeepSeek-R1’s 128K).
High Costs: API pricing is 90-95% more expensive.
Latency Issues: Slower responses for complex tasks.

Conclusion

DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 represent two distinct approaches to reasoning AI. DeepSeek-R1 excels in cost efficiency, mathematical reasoning, and open-source flexibility, whileOpenAI o1 leads in general knowledge and enterprise integration. Developers and researchers should choose based on their priorities:
DeepSeek-R1: Ideal for budget-conscious, math/coding-focused projects.

OpenAI o1: Better for broad reasoning tasks with corporate support.
Try DeepSeek-R1’s API (10K free tokens) or explore OpenAI o1’s playground to test these models firsthand.

Stay Ahead in AI: For cutting-edge tutorials, model comparisons, and industry insights, subscribe to the SkillUpExchange Newsletter. Get weekly updates on AI advancements, practical guides, and exclusive discounts on AI tools—direct to your inbox.

FAQs

Is DeepSeek-R1 free for commercial use?
Yes! The model is MIT-licensed, but API usage starts at $0.14/million tokens.

Can I run DeepSeek-R1 locally?
Use open-source tools like vLLM to deploy distilled models (e.g., vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B).

Does OpenAI o1 support Chinese?
Yes, but DeepSeek-R1 is better optimized for Chinese tasks.

Image of AssemblyAI tool

Transforming Interviews into Publishable Stories with AssemblyAI

Insightview is a modern web application that streamlines the interview workflow for journalists. By leveraging AssemblyAI's LeMUR and Universal-2 technology, it transforms raw interview recordings into structured, actionable content, dramatically reducing the time from recording to publication.

Key Features:
🎥 Audio/video file upload with real-time preview
🗣️ Advanced transcription with speaker identification
⭐ Automatic highlight extraction of key moments
✍️ AI-powered article draft generation
📤 Export interview's subtitles in VTT format

Read full post

Top comments (0)

A Workflow Copilot. Tailored to You.

Pieces.app image

Our desktop app, with its intelligent copilot, streamlines coding by generating snippets, extracting code from screenshots, and accelerating problem-solving.

Read the docs

👋 Kindness is contagious

Discover a treasure trove of wisdom within this insightful piece, highly respected in the nurturing DEV Community enviroment. Developers, whether novice or expert, are encouraged to participate and add to our shared knowledge basin.

A simple "thank you" can illuminate someone's day. Express your appreciation in the comments section!

On DEV, sharing ideas smoothens our journey and strengthens our community ties. Learn something useful? Offering a quick thanks to the author is deeply appreciated.

Okay