Choosing a backend as a service (BaaS) is tough. Firebase has been around forever, but Supabase has been stealing the spotlight. Both offer generous free tiers β but which one actually works better for developers in 2025?
Letβs break it down π
π₯ Free Tier Overview
Firebase Free Tier
- β 50,000 document reads/day (Firestore)
- β 50,000 writes/day
- β 1 GB storage
- β 10 GB hosting bandwidth
- β Free Authentication (basic email/Google sign-in)
Limits: Realtime DB pricing can get expensive. Vendor lock-in is a real concern.
Supabase Free Tier
- β 500 MB database storage (Postgres)
- β 50 MB file storage
- β 2 GB bandwidth
- β 50,000 monthly active users for Auth
- β Edge Functions (100,000 monthly invocations)
Limits: Lower storage than Firebase free tier. Still catching up on ecosystem maturity.
βοΈ Where Supabase Wins
- Postgres instead of Firestore β SQL support, powerful queries.
- Auth is extremely generous (50k MAU for free).
- Edge functions are built in.
βοΈ Where Firebase Wins
- Bigger ecosystem: Docs, community, tutorials.
- Hosting & bandwidth are better for free projects.
- Battle-tested reliability (Google infra).
π Verdict
- Choose Supabase if you want SQL + generous free Auth + open-source vibes.
- Choose Firebase if you want Google ecosystem + scale + hosting edge.
π Both are great. But if youβre prototyping fast and want to avoid Google lock-in, Supabase feels more 2025-friendly.
π¬ Whatβs your experience with Firebase vs Supabase free tier? Drop your thoughts below π
Top comments (0)