Every website audit I've ever used hands you a list of problems. Slow mobile, missing alt text, no schema, weak cache headers. Then it leaves you staring at that list wondering: okay, now what do I actually do?
That gap between diagnosis and execution is where most fixes die.
So we closed it.
What the prompts actually look like
Here's a real example generated by the engine for a self-audit of our own tool's homepage at outboundautonomy.com. The full audit scored Visual UX: 53/100, Conversion: 43/100, Technical SEO: 57/100 — an honest grade F at 58/100 composite.
Our engine found 3 competitors (by name — SeoPros, BestSeo, SeoServices), detected our tech stack (Next.js), and generated this:
## Fix: 3 images missing alt text
### Problem
3 of 12 images lack descriptive alt text. This hurts accessibility
and SEO — screen readers can't describe the images, and search
engines lose image-ranking context.
### Current State
- Page: https://outboundautonomy.com/
- Score Impact: +10 points
- Revenue Impact: ~$540/mo estimated recovery
- Tech Stack: Next.js
- Difficulty: easy
- Category: Visual & UX
### Fix Instructions
1. In your Next.js app, locate each <Image> or <img> tag
that renders without an `alt` prop or with alt="".
2. Pass a descriptive `alt` prop (e.g. alt="Dashboard showing
audit score card with 7 category gauges").
3. Tip: use next/image for automatic optimization — pass alt
on every <Image> component.
4. Re-test on mobile (375px) and desktop (1280px).
### Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Every <img> and <next-image> has a non-empty alt attribute
- [ ] `npm run build` succeeds with no type errors
- [ ] Screen reader announces the alt text correctly
That's the entire prompt. You copy it, paste it into Cursor or Claude, and say \"fix this.\" The AI has everything: the page URL, the score impact, the revenue figure, the framework-specific instructions (Next.js in this case), and exact acceptance criteria to confirm the fix worked.
Why this matters for \"vibe coders\"
If you're building with Cursor, Bolt, v0, or Claude — and a huge portion of our early users are — you don't want a report. You want a command.
The old workflow:
- Run an audit → get a PDF with 47 bullet points
- Read the whole thing → figure out which issues matter
- Open your editor → try to remember what the report said
- Write a prompt by hand → \"hey Claude, fix my meta description\"
- Guess whether it actually worked
The new workflow:
- Run our audit → get pasteable fix prompts
- Select one → Cmd+C, Cmd+V into your AI editor
- \"Fix this\" → done
That's it. From 5 steps to 2 steps. From \"I need to understand SEO\" to \"I just need to paste.\"
What the engine checks (all 7 dimensions)
The full deep audit (free, 3-day trial, card required, $0 today) scores your site across:
| Dimension | What It Measures |
|---|---|
| Visual & UX | Design era, image quality, alt text coverage, viewport, mobile responsiveness |
| Conversion & Flow | Form count, phone visibility, CTAs, email capture, booking widgets, social proof |
| Technical SEO | SSL, meta tags, schema markup, canonical URLs, header hierarchy |
| Content Quality | Readability (Flesch-Kincaid), freshness signals, typos/grammar, blog presence |
| Competitor Intelligence | Side-by-side scoring vs 3-5 discovered competitors across all dimensions |
| Domain & SEO Value | TLD quality, estimated domain authority, traffic estimates |
| Page Signals & Speed | Real-measured TTFB, cache headers, broken images, favicon, color contrast, render-blocking resources, page weight |
Each issue detected in any of those dimensions generates a pasteable fix prompt. Top 10 issues per audit, each with its own structured prompt.
The tech-stack awareness is the secret sauce
Generic prompts are useless. \"Add a viewport meta tag\" is fine for raw HTML, but if you're on Next.js, the fix path is export const metadata in app/layout.tsx. If you're on WordPress, it's in header.php. If you're on Shopify, it's in theme.liquid.
Our engine detects your stack (Framework: Next/React/Vue/WordPress/Shopify/Wix/Squarespace/Webflow) and generates prompts with the exact file paths and naming conventions for your platform:
- Next.js prompts say \"use the Metadata API in app/layout.tsx\" + \"add a tip about next/image for automatic optimization\"
- WordPress prompts say \"install Yoast or RankMath and set the title per page\" + \"a caching plugin handles Cache-Control\"
- Shopify prompts say \"add a contact form via the Shopify form element\" + \"surface the phone number in section settings\"
One engine, seven platforms, zero generic advice.
What changed from \"basic audit\" to \"AI-ready\"
Three things:
Structured prompt generation. Every fix prompt follows a template: Problem → Current State (with real data) → Fix Instructions (numbered, executable steps) → Acceptance Criteria (checkboxes) → Tech stack hook. This is the same format Claude/Cursor understand.
Revenue context per issue. Each issue carries an industry-benchmarked revenue range with a plain-English basis explaining WHY that figure applies. \"No lead capture form: 0 forms found — form-equipped sites convert 3-5× more visitors than phone-only.\" The prompt carries the revenue figure so you prioritize correctly.
Competitor comparison integration. When we score your site, we also score 3-5 of your actual competitors (we discover them automatically via search or accept your list). The fix prompts reference what your competitors do better — so you're not just checking boxes, you're catching up to your real competition.
Try it free (3 days, card required, $0 today)
The trial is live right now at outboundautonomy.com/trial. $0 for 3 days, then $49/mo. Card required to prevent abuse.
Your free scan takes ~30 seconds. It scores your site across all 7 dimensions, gives you preview scores, and tells you exactly what the deep audit contains. If you want the full report with AI-ready fix prompts and competitor comparison, activate the trial.
What you get in the trial:
- Full deep audit with all 7 dimension scores
- AI-ready fix prompts for the top 10 issues
- Competitor comparison table (3-5 discoverable competitors scored against you)
- Before/after projections showing score improvement
- Revenue impact analysis with per-issue breakdown
No commitment. Try it, paste a fix prompt into your editor, see if it works. If the tool doesn't save you time, cancel before day 3 and pay $0.
Built by us, verified by our auditor, dogfooded on our own site every deploy. Every fix prompt in the article above came from a real audit on our own production URL.
Top comments (0)