Monorepo Tooling in 2025: Turborepo, Nx, and When to Split
Monorepos are back in fashion — and for good reason. When you have multiple packages that share code and deploy together, a well-configured monorepo beats managing separate repos.
Why Monorepos?
- Shared code without npm publishing
- Atomic commits across packages
- Single CI/CD pipeline
- Consistent tooling and dependency versions
- Easier refactoring across package boundaries
Turborepo: Fast Builds via Caching
Turborepo's core value: never rebuild what hasn't changed.
npx create-turbo@latest my-monorepo
// turbo.json
{
"$schema": "https://turbo.build/schema.json",
"tasks": {
"build": {
"dependsOn": ["^build"], // Build deps first
"outputs": [".next/**", "dist/**"]
},
"test": {
"dependsOn": ["^build"],
"inputs": ["src/**", "test/**"]
},
"lint": {
"inputs": ["src/**", ".eslintrc*"]
}
}
}
// package.json (root)
{
"workspaces": ["apps/*", "packages/*"],
"scripts": {
"build": "turbo build",
"test": "turbo test",
"dev": "turbo dev --parallel"
}
}
Remote caching (Vercel's cache or self-hosted) means CI skips unchanged packages — even across machines.
Nx: Full-Featured for Large Teams
Nx adds more than caching: code generation, dependency graph visualization, module boundaries enforcement:
npx create-nx-workspace@latest
// nx.json
{
"targetDefaults": {
"build": { "cache": true },
"test": { "cache": true }
},
"affected": {
"defaultBase": "main"
}
}
Nx's killer feature for large teams: affected commands. Only test/build what changed:
nx affected:test # Only runs tests for changed packages
nx affected:build # Only builds what's affected by the change
Package Structure
my-monorepo/
apps/
web/ # Next.js frontend
api/ # Express/Fastify backend
mobile/ # React Native
packages/
ui/ # Shared component library
types/ # Shared TypeScript types
utils/ # Shared utilities
config/ # Shared ESLint, TS configs
Turborepo vs Nx
| Turborepo | Nx | |
|---|---|---|
| Learning curve | Low | Higher |
| Build caching | Excellent | Excellent |
| Code generation | No | Yes |
| Dep graph viz | Basic | Full |
| Best for | Startups, small teams | Large orgs |
When to Split into Separate Repos
Consider splitting when:
- Teams have completely different deployment cadences
- Security requirements mandate isolation
- The monorepo build takes >10 minutes even with caching
- Teams need to use different toolchains
For most SaaS products, a monorepo with Turborepo is the right call. The AI SaaS Starter Kit ships with a Turborepo setup for web + API + shared packages, so you start with proper monorepo structure from day one.
Top comments (0)