If you contribute to open source, work in a collaborative engineering team, or operate in cloud and CI/CD-driven environments, you’ve probably felt this pain while reviewing Pull Requests:
Browser → VS Code → Browser → Terminal → Browser
I didn’t realize how much this constant context switching was slowing me down until I changed where I review Pull Requests. After adopting the GitHub Pull Requests & Issues extension in VS Code, PR reviews stopped being a distraction and became a first-class DevOps quality gate in my workflow.
In this post, I’ll share:
How reviewing GitHub Pull Requests inside VS Code improved my daily workflow
Why this matters in cloud-native and CI/CD environments
Who should consider using this setup
The Problem: Context Switching Kills Focus
Before using the extension, my Pull Request review process looked like this:
- Open a Pull Request in the browser
- Read code diffs
- Switch to VS Code to inspect files
- Go back to GitHub to comment
- Repeat
This resulted in:
- Lost focus during reviews
- Slower feedback cycles
- Harder code comprehension
- Increased mental overhead
In modern DevOps workflows, Pull Requests are not just collaboration tools — they are control points that sit directly in front of CI/CD pipelines. Any friction here compounds quickly.
Pull Requests as a DevOps Control Point in CI/CD Pipelines
In cloud and DevOps environments, every Pull Request can trigger:
- Continuous integration pipelines
- Automated tests and linting
- Security and dependency checks
- Deployment workflows
This means Pull Requests are often the last human checkpoint before automation takes over.
For engineers aiming to grow into DevOps or cloud roles, mastering efficient Pull Request workflows is essential. Improving how we review PRs directly impacts:
- Deployment speed
- System reliability
- Production stability
Treating Pull Requests as first-class workflow checkpoints is no longer optional.
What Is the GitHub Pull Requests & Issues Extension?
The GitHub Pull Requests & Issues extension brings GitHub directly into VS Code.
With it, you can:
- Review Pull Requests inside the editor
- Add inline comments with full code context
- Checkout PR branches locally
- Create and manage Pull Requests
- Track assigned issues
All without leaving your development environment.
☁️ Reviewing Pull Requests with Cloud-Native Context in VS Code
In cloud-native systems, small changes can have an outsized impact — especially when services run across multiple environments.
Reviewing Pull Requests directly inside VS Code allows me to analyze changes with full system context, not just isolated diffs. I can explore repository structure, understand service boundaries, and assess how a change might affect runtime behaviour.
This is especially useful when PRs include:
- Configuration files
- Environment-specific settings
- API integrations
- Changes affecting scalability or availability
By reviewing these changes in the editor, I’m better positioned to catch issues that could lead to runtime errors, misconfigurations, or unstable deployments.
⚙️ Checking Out Pull Requests Locally as a DevOps Quality Gate
One of the most valuable features of the extension is the ability to checkout Pull Request branches directly inside VS Code.
With a single click, I can pull the contributor’s branch and run the project locally, turning PR review into an early quality gate instead of a passive check.
In practice, this allows me to:
- Validate changes before they reach CI/CD pipelines
- Catch issues that could break automated builds or deployments
- Test application behavior in a production-aware environment
- Review changes to configuration files or environment variables
For example, while reviewing a PR that modified environment variables for a service, checking out the branch locally helped me catch a missing default value that would have caused a runtime failure in staging — something CI wouldn’t have flagged until much later.
This supports a shift-left DevOps approach, catching issues earlier in the development lifecycle before they consume CI resources or cause failed deployments.
✍️ Writing Better, More Actionable Feedback
Because I review Pull Requests inside VS Code:
- Feedback is clearer and more specific
- Comments are written with full code awareness
- Suggestions are easier to act on
Instead of vague feedback like:
“This might break something.”
I can provide targeted guidance such as:
“This function doesn’t handle null values — consider adding a guard clause to prevent runtime errors.”
Clear, actionable feedback improves collaboration and code quality for everyone involved.
The Biggest Benefits I Noticed
After fully adopting this workflow, I noticed:
- ✅ Less context switching
- ✅ Faster Pull Request reviews
- ✅ Better focus and code understanding
- ✅ Improved collaboration
- ✅ Higher confidence when approving or requesting changes
It didn’t just improve my speed, it improved the quality of my contributions.
Who Should Use This Extension?
I’d especially recommend it for:
- Open-source contributors
- Remote engineering teams
- Backend developers
- Cloud and DevOps engineers managing CI/CD workflows
- Anyone who spends most of their time in VS Code
If VS Code is already your primary development environment, this extension is a simple productivity win.
Tips to Get More Value from It
A few small optimizations that made a big difference for me:
- Enable Pull Request notifications inside VS Code
- Use the Files Changed view instead of raw diffs
- Combine it with GitLens for deeper commit insights
- Use Pull Request templates to standardize reviews
CI/CD Diagram: Pull Requests in VS Code as an Early Quality Gate
Developer
↓
Feature Branch
↓
Pull Request (VS Code)
├── Code Review
├── Local Testing
├── Config Validation
↓
CI Pipeline
├── Build
├── Tests
├── Security Checks
↓
Merge
↓
Deployment (Cloud)
Pull Requests reviewed in VS Code act as an early quality gate, reducing CI failures and improving deployment reliability.
Final Thoughts
If Pull Requests are part of your daily workflow, especially in cloud-native or CI/CD-heavy environments, optimizing how you review them matters more than you might think.
Treat Pull Requests not as a checkbox, but as an engineering control point.
Small workflow changes can deliver an outsized impact on reliability, collaboration, and deployment confidence.
Top comments (0)