TypeScript gives developers confidence, but it does nothing to protect your API at runtime. Every request your server receives is untyped, untrusted, and potentially hostile.
Without explicit validation, invalid inputs slip into your system and fail later, in places that are harder to debug and easier to exploit. This is how subtle bugs and security issues sneak into production even in well-typed codebases.
Strong APIs validate inputs at the boundary. Requests are checked early, rejected clearly, and never allowed to pollute internal state. Errors are predictable, structured, and treated as part of the public contract.
Validation also improves velocity. When inputs are guaranteed, business logic becomes simpler, tests become clearer, and engineers spend less time defending against impossible states.
If your API doesn’t validate inputs explicitly, you’re relying on luck and luck doesn’t scale.
If you enjoyed this, you can follow my work on LinkedIn at linkedin
, explore my projects on GitHub
, or find me on Bluesky
Top comments (1)
This is a great reminder that compile-time types don’t protect you at runtime. Validation at the API boundary isn’t just about correctness it’s a security control.
Rejecting malformed or unexpected input early reduces the attack surface (injection, mass assignment, abuse of optional fields) and keeps untrusted data away from business logic. I’ve also found that strong validation makes authorization and auditing much easier downstream.