DEV Community

Cover image for ๐Ÿ—๏ธ ๐”๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐’๐จ๐Ÿ๐ญ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ โ€” ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐’๐œ๐š๐ฅ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐’๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ฌ
Zamirul Kabir
Zamirul Kabir

Posted on

๐Ÿ—๏ธ ๐”๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐’๐จ๐Ÿ๐ญ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ โ€” ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐’๐œ๐š๐ฅ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐’๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ฌ

๐Ÿ—๏ธ ๐”๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐’๐จ๐Ÿ๐ญ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ โ€” ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐’๐œ๐š๐ฅ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐’๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ฌ
Every great building starts with a blueprint.
Similarly, every successful software system begins with a well-thought-out architecture pattern.
But what exactly are Software Architecture Patterns, and why do they matter so much?
Letโ€™s dive in ๐Ÿ‘‡

๐Ÿ”น ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐€๐ซ๐ž ๐’๐จ๐Ÿ๐ญ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ?
Think of architecture patterns as reusable solutions to common design challenges in software systems.
They define how components interact, scale, and evolve, ensuring your code isnโ€™t just working today but maintainable tomorrow.

๐Ÿ’ก๐Ÿ. ๐‹๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ (๐-๐“๐ข๐ž๐ซ) ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž
๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ: Traditional enterprise apps, monoliths
Divides the system into layers like:
๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐‹๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ โ€“ UI & frontend logic
๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐‹๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ โ€“ Core rules and logic
๐ƒ๐š๐ญ๐š ๐‹๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ โ€“ Database and storage
โœ… Pros: Easy to develop, test, and manage
โš ๏ธ Cons: Harder to scale; layers tightly coupled

โš™๏ธ ๐Ÿ. ๐„๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ญ-๐ƒ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ง ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž
๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ: Real-time systems, microservices, IoT
Components communicate via events (like โ€œuser_createdโ€ or โ€œorder_placedโ€) instead of direct calls.
Each service reacts independently โ€” improving scalability and resilience.
โœ… Pros: High decoupling, great for asynchronous workflows
โš ๏ธ Cons: Debugging and tracing events can be tricky

๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ‘. ๐Œ๐ข๐œ๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž
๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ: Large-scale, distributed systems
Breaks the app into small, independent services, each responsible for a specific feature (e.g., user, payment, catalog).
They communicate via APIs and can be deployed separately.
โœ… Pros: Scalable, flexible, language-agnostic
โš ๏ธ Cons: Requires a strong DevOps & monitoring setup

๐ŸŒ ๐Ÿ’. ๐‚๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐ญโ€“๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž
๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ: Web & network-based systems
Classic pattern โ€” the client requests data and the server responds.
Still forms the backbone of modern web systems (like RESTful APIs).
โœ… Pros: Simple, clear separation of concerns
โš ๏ธ Cons: Can become bottlenecked on the server side

โ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ“. ๐Œ๐ข๐œ๐ซ๐จ๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฅ (๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ -๐ข๐ง) ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž
๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ: Extensible applications like IDEs or CMS
Core system (the โ€œkernelโ€) provides basic services, while plug-ins extend functionality dynamically.
โœ… Pros: Flexible and easy to extend
โš ๏ธ Cons: Requires careful version control and plugin management

๐Ÿงฉ ๐Ÿ”. ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž-๐Ž๐ซ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž (๐’๐Ž๐€)
๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ: Enterprise-level applications
Focuses on reusable services communicating through a common protocol.
โœ… Pros: Promotes reuse and interoperability
โš ๏ธ Cons: Can become complex without proper governance

๐Ÿ”„ ๐Ÿ•. ๐„๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐’๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ข๐ง๐  & ๐‚๐๐‘๐’ (๐€๐๐ฏ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž๐)

Best for: Systems requiring audit trails and complex state management

Instead of storing only the current state, Event Sourcing records every change as an event.
Paired with CQRS, it separates read/write operations for better scalability.

โœ… Pros: Perfect for high-traffic, data-critical apps
โš ๏ธ Cons: Complex to implement and maintain

๐Ÿš€๐…๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐“๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ

Choosing the right architecture isnโ€™t about whatโ€™s โ€œtrending.โ€
Itโ€™s about whatโ€™s right for your context, your teamโ€™s skills, and your systemโ€™s goals.

โ€œGood architecture is not about perfection โ€” itโ€™s about evolution.โ€

Which pattern do you use most in your projects โ€” and why?
Letโ€™s discuss ๐Ÿ‘‡

Top comments (0)