Have you noticed you write a lot of asynchronous code in Express request handlers? This is normal because you need to communicate with the database, the file system, and other APIs.
When you have so much asynchronous code, it helps to use Async/await. It makes your code easier to understand.
Today, I want to share how to use async/await in an Express request handler.
Note: Before you continue, you need to know what Async/await is. If you don't know, you can read this article for more information.
Using Async/await with a request handler
To use Async/await, you need to use the async
keyword when you define a request handler. (Note: These request handlers are known as called "controllers". I prefer calling them request handlers because request handlers are more explicit).
app.post("/testing", async (req, res) => {
// Do something here
});
Once you have the async
keyword, you can await
something immediately in your code.
app.post("/testing", async (req, res) => {
const user = await User.findOne({ email: req.body.email });
});
Handling Async errors
Let's say you want to create a user through a POST request. To create a user, you need to pass in a firstName
and an email
address. Your Mongoose Schema looks like this:
const userSchema = new Schema({
email: {
type: String,
required: true,
unique: true
},
firstName: {
type: String,
required: true
}
});
Here's your request handler:
app.post("/signup", async (req, res) => {
const { email, firstName } = req.body;
const user = new User({ email, firstName });
const ret = await user.save();
res.json(ret);
});
Now, let's say you send a request that lacks an email address to your server.
fetch('/signup', {
method: 'post'
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }
body: JSON.stringify({
firstName: 'Zell'
})
}
This request results in an error. Unfortunately, Express will not be able to handle this error. You'll receive a log like this:
To handle an error in an asynchronous function, you need to catch the error first. You can do this with try/catch
.
app.post("/signup", async (req, res) => {
try {
const { email, firstName } = req.body;
const user = new User({ email, firstName });
const ret = await user.save();
res.json(ret);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
}
});
Next, you pass the error into an Express error handler with the next
argument.
app.post("/signup", async (req, res, next) => {
try {
const { email, firstName } = req.body;
const user = new User({ email, firstName });
const ret = await user.save();
res.json(ret);
} catch (error) {
// Passes errors into the error handler
return next(error);
}
});
If you did not write a custom error handler yet, Express will handle the error for you with its default error handler. (Though I recommend you write a custom error handler. You can learn more about it here).
Express's default error handler will:
- Set the HTTP status to 500
- Send a Text response back to the requester
- Log the text response in the console
Handling two or more async errors
If you need to handle two await
statements, you might write this code:
app.post("/signup", async (req, res, next) => {
try {
await firstThing();
} catch (error) {
return next(error);
}
try {
await secondThing();
} catch (error) {
return next(error);
}
});
This is unnecessary. If firstThing
results in an error, the request will be sent to an error handler immediately. You would not trigger a call for secondThing
. If secondThing
results in an error, firstThing
would not have triggered an error.
This means: Only one error will be sent to the error handler. It also means we can wrap all await
statements in ONE try/catch
statement.
app.post("/signup", async (req, res, next) => {
try {
await firstThing();
await secondThing();
} catch (error) {
return next(error);
}
});
Cleaning up
It sucks to have a try/catch
statement in each request handler. They make the request handler seem more complicated than it has to be.
A simple way is to change the try/catch
into a promise. This feels more friendly.
app.post('/signup', async(req, res, next) => {
function runAsync () {
await firstThing()
await secondThing()
}
runAsync()
.catch(next)
})
But it's a chore to write runAsync
for every Express handler. We can abstract it into a wrapper function. And we can attach this wrapper function to each request handler
function runAsyncWrapper (callback) {
return function (req, res, next) {
callback(req, res, next)
.catch(next)
}
}
app.post('/signup', runAsyncWrapper(async(req, res) => {
await firstThing()
await secondThing()
})
Express Async Handler
You don't have to write runAsyncWrapper
code each time you write an express app either. Alexei Bazhenov has created a package called express-async-handler that does the job in a slightly more robust way. (It ensures next
is always the last argument).
To use express-async-handler
, you have to install it first:
npm install express-async-handler --save
Using it in your app:
const asyncHandler = require('express-async-handler')
app.post('/signup', asyncHandler(async(req, res) => {
await firstThing()
await secondThing()
})
I don't like to write asyncHandler
. It's quite long. My obvious solution is to abbreviate asyncHandler
to ash
.
If you're fancier, you can consider using @awaitjs/express by Valeri Karpov. It adds methods like getAsync
and postAsync
to Express so you don't have to use express-async-handler
.
Thanks for reading. This article was originally posted on my blog. Sign up for my newsletter if you want more articles to help you become a better frontend developer.
Top comments (3)
some things to note here:
try / catch
blocks are not minified, haven't tested it out yet, but it's something to be careful about.try / catch
blocks, note that:async
function returns aPromise
So you could also do things like this:
Thank you SO MUCH for not using the wholly NOT real world
settimeout()
in your examples. Here's something that I can read thru and see actually applied.Amazing, thank you!