DEV Community

Zoltan Fehervari
Zoltan Fehervari

Posted on

Every compared FastAPI vs Flask?

I have come to understand that when developing web applications, selecting the right Python web framework is crucial. FastAPI and Flask are two popular options that have gained traction recently.

I will attempt to introduce these frameworks and highlight their key features and differences.

FastAPI: A modern web framework for building APIs with Python 3.7+. It focuses on speed and performance, using Python type hints for fast development, automatic API documentation, and editor support. It also supports asynchronous programming, making it suitable for real-time applications.

Flask: A lightweight web framework that is easy to use and highly customizable. Ideal for small to medium-sized web applications and RESTful APIs, Flask follows a minimalist “micro-framework” philosophy, allowing developers to choose their own libraries and extensions.

Performance and Scalability

FastAPI: Known for high performance due to Pydantic models and Starlette for handling requests. It supports asynchronous programming, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.

Flask: While not as fast as FastAPI, Flask is still a performant framework. It uses Werkzeug for handling requests and Jinja2 for templating, suitable for smaller applications.

Performance Benchmarks: FastAPI outperforms Flask in terms of requests per second and maximum concurrent requests. However, performance depends on specific use cases.

Scalability: Both frameworks are scalable, but FastAPI’s asynchronous programming and Pydantic models make it better suited for high-throughput applications. Flask’s modular design supports scalability for less demanding projects.

Routing and Request Handling

FastAPI: Provides a powerful routing system based on Python type hints. It supports asynchronous request handling for better performance and generates automatic documentation for all routes.

Flask: Offers a simple and customizable routing system. It handles requests synchronously, which may be less optimal for high-concurrency applications.

Database Integration

FastAPI: Supports popular databases like SQLite, PostgreSQL, and MySQL. It integrates well with ORMs such as SQLAlchemy, Tortoise ORM, and GINO, supporting asynchronous database operations.

Flask: Does not have built-in database support but offers extensions like Flask-SQLAlchemy and Flask-MySQL. It supports ORMs like SQLAlchemy and Pony ORM, providing flexibility in choosing databases.

Authentication and Authorization

FastAPI: Provides built-in support for OAuth2, including password, client credentials, and JWT grant types. It supports scopes for granular authorization.

Flask: Uses extensions like Flask-Login for authentication and Flask-Security for authorization. These extensions offer a wide range of security features, including SQLAlchemy and MongoEngine integration.

Documentation and Testing

FastAPI: Excellent documentation with step-by-step guides, code examples, and interactive API documentation (Swagger UI). It has a built-in testing framework and supports popular testing tools like Pytest.

Flask: Well-organized documentation with a comprehensive API reference. It supports interactive API documentation through Flask-RESTful and provides a built-in testing framework compatible with Pytest and Nose.

Community and Communication

FastAPI: Rapidly growing community with a supportive environment. It has a smaller but active ecosystem of plugins and libraries.

Flask: Large and well-established community with an extensive ecosystem of plugins and libraries. However, not all plugins are actively maintained.

Use Cases and Project Suitability

FastAPI: Best for high-performance APIs, scalable projects, teams that prioritize type hints, and real-time applications.

Flask: Ideal for small to medium-sized projects, customizable and unopinionated development, simpler codebases, and integration with third-party libraries.

*Performance Benchmarks and Real-World Examples
*

FastAPI: Excels in performance benchmarks and is used in high-performance applications like the OpenAPI project.

Flask: Suitable for smaller web applications, such as the microblogging platform Flaskr.

Heroku

This site is built on Heroku

Join the ranks of developers at Salesforce, Airbase, DEV, and more who deploy their mission critical applications on Heroku. Sign up today and launch your first app!

Get Started

Top comments (0)

Postmark Image

Speedy emails, satisfied customers

Are delayed transactional emails costing you user satisfaction? Postmark delivers your emails almost instantly, keeping your customers happy and connected.

Sign up

👋 Kindness is contagious

Please leave a ❤️ or a friendly comment on this post if you found it helpful!

Okay