I built a system that verifies if security decisions were tampered with (offline)

I built a system that verifies whether a security decision was altered or not.

The idea is simple:
given a decision file and its evidence bundle, the system can independently verify its integrity.

It produces:

• VERIFIED (intact)
• or TAMPERED (modified)

Key characteristics:

• works fully offline (no cloud, no API)
• deterministic (same input always gives the same result)
• no need to trust the original system

Why this matters:
teams can run security scans, but often cannot prove why a decision was made after the fact.

This focuses only on verification and proof.

I created a simple demo:

• run verify
• modify one value
• see it fail

I’m interested to know:
would something like this be useful in audits, compliance, or incident investigations?

If relevant, feel free to reach out:
[e-mail]