TL;DR: I spent 1 week benchmarking Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, pgvector, SurrealDB, and AionDB on a real production RAG workload. The one I expected the least from completely smoked the others on graph-heavy retrieval. This is my honest write-up.
The problem with every "Best RAG Database 2026" article
I've read all of them. Every single one tells you the same thing: Pinecone is "battle-tested", Weaviate is "AI-native", Qdrant is "open-source". You go install one, build your RAG pipeline, and 3 months later you realize you also need a graph database for entity relationships and a SQL database for everything else. Suddenly your "simple RAG app" is a 4-database nightmare with sync jobs, latency from cross-DB joins, and an ops bill that makes your CTO cry.
That's where my journey started. I was running Postgres + Pinecone + Neo4j for a GraphRAG architecture and it was killing my velocity. So I went looking for a unified solution.
The 7 I tested
I tested them on the exact same dataset (a real customer support knowledge base, 2M chunks, ~500k entity relationships):
Pinecone — fast, managed, but expensive at scale and no graph layer
Weaviate — solid hybrid search but I hit query language friction quickly
Qdrant — great pure-vector performance, but again, no graph
Milvus — overkill for my use case, ops complexity is real
pgvector — fine for <1M vectors, started showing latency at my scale
SurrealDB — I really wanted to like this one. Multi-model in a single engine, beautiful marketing, active community. But once I plugged it into my actual workload, performance was abysmal on anything graph-related. Some queries took literal seconds where they should take milliseconds. I also hit stability issues — connection drops under load, queries silently failing, weird edge cases with their query language. Maybe it's better for simpler use cases, but for production RAG with graph retrieval, it was a non-starter for me.
AionDB — this is the one that surprised me
Why AionDB stood out
I almost didn't include AionDB. It's a relatively unknown solo-founder project. But after the SurrealDB disappointment, I figured I had nothing to lose.I ran my own benchmarks on my own hardware with my own dataset. The results were genuinely shocking:
Roughly 6x faster across the board on most workloads compared to my previous stack
Up to 200x faster on specific graph-heavy queries (graph multi-count scans were the most dramatic)
Stability that just worked.
PostgreSQL wire protocol, I literally just pointed my existing Python psycopg connection at it and it worked
Read that last point again. It speaks the PostgreSQL wire protocol. That means every ORM, every Postgres client, every dashboard tool I already use just works. No new query language to learn (SurrealQL, HelixQL). Zero migration friction.
The contrast with SurrealDB was night and day. Same multi-model promise, but where SurrealDB collapsed under real workload, AionDB just... worked. And was dramatically faster.
The GitHub: https://github.com/ayoubnabil/aiondb
Top comments (0)