DEV Community

Cover image for FastAPI vs Flask – Choosing the Right Tool for Scalable APIs
Aditya Rajak
Aditya Rajak

Posted on

FastAPI vs Flask – Choosing the Right Tool for Scalable APIs

Flask has been a fan-favorite in Python web development for over a decade. But with the rise of asynchronous programming, FastAPI has entered the scene as a modern, lightning-fast alternative. In this post, we’ll compare FastAPI and Flask head-to-head to help you decide which framework is the best fit for your next project.

1. Setup & Simplicity
Flask: Minimalist, very easy to get started

FastAPI: Also easy, but requires understanding of type hints and Pydantic

Code snippets for basic “Hello World” app in both

2. Performance
Benchmark comparison (Uvicorn + FastAPI outperforms Flask with WSGI)

Async support is built-in for FastAPI

Flask can do async but it’s limited and requires extra setup

3. Data Validation
FastAPI: Uses Pydantic for auto-validation

Flask: Needs manual validation or libraries like Marshmallow

Example: input validation for a POST API

4. Dependency Injection & Modular Code
FastAPI has built-in dependency injection

Flask needs third-party packages (e.g., Flask-Injection)

5. Swagger & Documentation
FastAPI auto-generates Swagger UI and ReDoc

Flask requires extensions like Flask-RESTPlus or Flask-Swagger

🛠 6. Ecosystem & Maturity
Flask: Larger community, tons of extensions

FastAPI: Rapidly growing, backed by strong devs like Sebastián Ramírez

Flask better for older, stable enterprise apps

FastAPI better for modern, async-first microservices

When to Choose What? (Decision Table)

Criteria Choose Flask if... Choose FastAPI if...
Simplicity & Setup You want a minimal setup You prefer modern tooling with type hints
Performance Performance isn’t a top priority You need async support and speed
Validation You’re okay with manual validation You want auto-validation using Pydantic
API Documentation You’ll write docs manually or use plugins You want Swagger/ReDoc out-of-the-box
Dependency Injection Not a major requirement You prefer built-in DI for clean modular code
Community & Ecosystem You rely on a large, mature community You want a modern and fast-growing framework
Best Use Case Monoliths, small projects Microservices, modern scalable APIs

Conclusion

Flask is still a strong choice for simple, traditional web apps, but FastAPI is rapidly becoming the preferred framework for high-performance APIs. Choose the one that aligns with your team’s goals, project complexity, and scalability needs.

Top comments (0)