One of the most common misconceptions about AI governance is treating it as a static framework: defined once, documented, and considered complete.
In reality, AI-enabled systems are dynamic by nature.
Data evolves, models adapt, operational contexts shift, and risk profiles change over time.
For this reason, governance cannot be understood as a fixed state. It must function as a sustained operational capability, designed to evolve without losing coherence, accountability, or control.
When governance fails to adapt at the same pace as the system, it becomes ineffective.
When it is designed to endure, governance becomes a structural mechanism for trust, resilience, and long-term oversight.
Top comments (1)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.