Design patterns often feel abstract until we clearly see the problem they solve.
The Singleton Pattern is one of the simplest & important design patterns, yet it is frequently misunderstood and misused.
In this article, we’ll break down the Singleton Pattern using clear explanations, a relatable real-world perspective, and a practical JavaScript example that shows why this pattern exists.
Core Values & Definition
Core Value
Control and consistency.
The Singleton Pattern exists to answer one important question:
How do we ensure that only one instance of an object exists across the entire application?
Some objects represent shared resources. Creating multiple instances of such objects can lead to:
- Inconsistent state
- Conflicting behavior
- Difficult debugging
- Unnecessary memory usage
Definition
The Singleton Pattern ensures that a class or object has only one instance and provides a global access point to that instance.
In simpler terms:
- Object creation is controlled
- Everyone works with the same instance
- The application behaves consistently
Main Features
A typical Singleton has the following characteristics:
- Single instance throughout the application lifecycle
- Global access point to that instance
- Controlled creation logic
- Shared state across all consumers
- Often lazy initialization (created only when needed)
A Real-World Perspective
Think about the music player on your phone.
You can control it from multiple places:
- Lock screen
- Notification panel
- Music app itself
But no matter where you press play or pause, there is only one active music player running in the background.
If your phone created a new music player instance every time you interacted with a control:
- Multiple songs would play at once
- Volume controls would conflict
- The entire experience would break
To avoid this, the system ensures that all controls talk to the same underlying player instance.
That is exactly how the Singleton Pattern works:
one shared instance, accessed from many places, behaving consistently.
Practical Exercise
Scenario: Centralized Application Logger
In real-world applications:
- Logs are generated from many different files
- Logs should be collected in one place
- Log order and consistency are important for debugging
Creating multiple logger instances would:
- Fragment logs
- Break ordering
- Make debugging harder
A logger is a perfect candidate for the Singleton Pattern.
JavaScript Implementation
class Logger {
constructor() {
if (Logger.instance) {
return Logger.instance;
}
this.logs = [];
Logger.instance = this;
}
log(message) {
const entry = `[${new Date().toISOString()}] ${message}`;
this.logs.push(entry);
console.log(entry);
}
getLogs() {
return this.logs;
}
}
// Usage
const logger1 = new Logger();
const logger2 = new Logger();
logger1.log("Application started");
logger2.log("User logged in");
console.log(logger1 === logger2); // true
What This Example Demonstrates
- Only one logger instance exists across the application
- Logs coming from different parts of the code end up in the same place
- Shared state is intentional and meaningful
- The need for Singleton is clear and practical, not theoretical
This example shows why Singleton is useful when multiple instances would actively cause problems, not just inconvenience.
Real-World Use Cases
The Singleton Pattern is commonly used for:
- Logger services
- Database connection managers
- Cache managers
- Message queue clients (Kafka, RabbitMQ)
- Feature flag systems
- Application-wide configuration loaders
These are shared infrastructure components that should remain consistent across the entire application.
How to Identify When to Use Singleton
Use the Singleton Pattern when:
- You need exactly one instance of an object
- The object represents a shared resource
- Multiple instances would lead to conflicts or inconsistency
- Consistency across the application is critical
- Object creation is expensive or resource-heavy
A helpful question to ask yourself is:
Does it make sense for this object to exist more than once?
If the answer is no, Singleton is a strong candidate.
When NOT to Use Singleton
Avoid the Singleton Pattern when:
- You need multiple independent instances
- Behavior should vary per consumer
- Test isolation is important
- Global state would increase coupling between modules
Singleton should be used deliberately, not by default.
Disadvantages and Trade-offs
Like any design pattern, Singleton comes with trade-offs.
Common Issues
- Behaves like global state
- Makes unit testing harder
- Introduces hidden dependencies
- Can be easily overused or abused
These issues usually arise when Singleton is used outside of infrastructure-level concerns.
How to Mitigate These Issues
- Keep Singleton logic minimal and focused
- Avoid placing business logic inside Singleton classes
- Prefer dependency injection where possible
- Use Singleton mainly for shared infrastructure components
Used carefully, these practices reduce the downsides significantly.
Final Thoughts
The Singleton Pattern is neither good nor bad—it is a tool.
Used correctly, it provides:
- Order
- Consistency
- Predictability
Used carelessly, it can introduce:
- Tight coupling
- Testing complexity
- Hidden dependencies
The key is intentional usage.
When a system genuinely needs one and only one instance, the Singleton Pattern is the right choice.
Top comments (0)