Iām setting up a local AI development environment on Windows + WSL2 and Iām trying to decide between two architectures.
Option 1 ā Ollama/Models on Windows
WSL2
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā Application ā
ā āāā Python ā
ā āāā .venv ā
ā āāā Source code ā
āāāāāāāāā¬āāāāāāāāāāāā
ā
HTTP localhost:11434
ā
ā¼
Windows
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā Ollama ā
ā ā ā
ā Models ā
ā ā ā
ā GPU ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Option 2 ā Ollama/Models inside WSL2
WSL2
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā Application ā
ā ā ā
ā Ollama ā
ā ā ā
ā Models ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāā¬āāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā
GPU access
ā
ā¼
Windows
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā GPU / Driver ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
My current setup is Option 1, and it works: WSL2 can access the Windows Ollama API through localhost:11434.
But Iām wondering if Option 2 is a better long-term architecture for local AI/LLM development.
Iām especially interested in:
š Performance
š® GPU utilization
š§ Model management
š¾ Disk usage
š§ Setup and maintenance
š§ Linux/ML tooling
š³ Docker integration
š Networking
š Future scalability
If you use Ollama with Windows + WSL2, which architecture would you choose and why?
And if you've actually used both setups, I'd especially like to hear about your experience.
š Option 1 or Option 2?
Top comments (0)