We’ve hit a wall in the software industry—and most people are too deep in Jira tickets or conference slides to realize it.
DevOps is dead. Not because the ideas were wrong, but because the implementation lost the plot. It was supposed to be about breaking down silos, accelerating delivery, and aligning engineering with outcomes. Instead, it got hijacked by process theater and rebranded operations teams.
Today? “DevOps” means YAML jockeys babysitting pipelines, managing Terraform drift, and debating whether Snyk or Prisma is more “shift-left.” We turned a movement into a tooling checklist.
And then there’s “vibe coding”—the aesthetic obsession with dark-mode VSCode, AI copilots, and working from a van in Patagonia. It’s cool for Twitter. It looks good in Reels. But it doesn’t ship. It doesn’t solve. It doesn’t scale.
We’re measuring activity, not impact. Shipping complexity, not clarity. We’ve created high-functioning teams that still produce mediocre outcomes because the operating model is broken.
It’s time for a new one.
Introducing OutcomeOps
OutcomeOps is an operating model for engineers who own the result, not just the release.
It’s born from experience—leading DevOps and cloud transformations for some of the largest Fortune 500s over the last 15 years, and more recently, building an AI platform from scratch. No committees. No tickets. Just fast, secure, reliable delivery tied directly to measurable business value.
OutcomeOps is:
• Pattern-Based Delivery: not a 1,000 microservices, but proven, repeatable design patterns that balance speed with sanity.
• Signal-First Feedback Loops: observability, not just logs. Signals that close the loop on quality, performance, and value.
• Compliance Built-In: security and compliance from the start. Not afterthoughts, not audit-season panic.
•Engineers as Owners: no more deployment handoffs. If you build it, you run it. If it breaks, you fix it.
• Monetization Mindset: everything you ship should tie back to outcomes—users, revenue, satisfaction, impact.
OutcomeOps is not another process framework. It’s not a product. It’s a mindset, a structure, and a standard. It’s the difference between engineering as ceremony… and engineering as execution.
OutcomeOps Is How
Building real products forces you to confront everything theory papers skip. In under 90 days, I shipped an AI platform with real paying users, over 70 Lambda functions, Grafana dashboards, and full infrastructure automation.
Not to brag—just to highlight that what I’ve been teaching companies for years is the same model I used to build this platform. Most people thought I was just teaching Terraform and CICD pipelines. But what I was really teaching was outcome-based thinking: how to ship to production 2–4 times a day, how to focus on user impact over tool debates, how to cut through complexity and get results.
Meanwhile, the industry is still debating EKS vs ECS while I’m building a fully functional, audit-passing, self-moderating, bank-integrated platform that reconciles its own ledger.
OutcomeOps isn’t theory. It’s practice. And it works.
Blogs are coming. Patterns are coming. Real-world examples—failures and wins—are coming.
This is the new model.
Top comments (0)