AWS SAA-C03 vs Azure AZ-104: Which Cloud Cert Should You Take First in 2026?
I got AWS Solutions Architect Associate (SAA-C03) in March and Azure Administrator (AZ-104) in September — same year, same “cloud engineer” job title on both sides.
If you’re staring at these two exams trying to figure out which one to sink 8 weeks into, this is the honest take I wish someone had given me.
The one-sentence answer
Take the cert your current employer runs.
If you’re job-hunting cold, take AWS SAA first — it opens more doors globally in 2026.
That’s the answer. If you want the reasoning, keep reading.
Comparison at a glance
| Area | AWS SAA-C03 | Azure AZ-104 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | AWS | Microsoft |
| Tier | Associate | Associate |
| Questions | 65 | 40–60 |
| Duration | 130 minutes | 100 minutes |
| Pass score | 720 / 1000 | 700 / 1000 |
| Cost | $150 | $165 |
| Prerequisites | None, but 1 year AWS experience recommended | None, but 6 months Azure experience recommended |
| Job listings mentioning it | ~48K | ~29K |
| Average base salary, US | $120K–180K | $95K–140K |
The salary gap is not because AWS is automatically “better.”
It is mostly because the AWS talent market is more mature. There are more senior architects with SAA in their profiles, more AWS-heavy job descriptions, and more premium roles filtering through AWS keywords.
If Microsoft continues gaining cloud mindshare over the next few years, AZ-104 could close some of that gap.
What AWS SAA-C03 actually tests
The AWS SAA-C03 exam is built around architecture judgment.
AWS SAA-C03 blueprint
| Domain | Weight |
|---|---|
| Design Secure Architectures | 30% |
| Design Resilient Architectures | 26% |
| Design High-Performing Architectures | 24% |
| Design Cost-Optimized Architectures | 20% |
Everything is scenario-based.
You are usually placed in the role of a solutions architect at a fictional company. You are asked to pick the best-fit service or architecture for a described workload.
The tricky part is this:
Most answer options technically work.
The exam is not asking, “Which option is possible?”
It is asking:
Which option is the most secure, resilient, performant, or cost-optimized for this exact scenario?
The hardest domain is usually Design Secure Architectures.
Even candidates who know EC2, S3, Lambda, and RDS well can struggle here because AWS security requires deeper understanding of:
- Shared Responsibility Model
- IAM policies
- Resource-based policies
- Service Control Policies
- Cross-account access
- Encryption choices
- Identity inheritance
SAA is less about memorizing service names and more about choosing the best architecture under constraints.
What AZ-104 actually tests
AZ-104 is more operational and hands-on.
AZ-104 blueprint
| Domain | Weight |
|---|---|
| Manage Azure identities and governance | 20–25% |
| Implement and manage storage | 15–20% |
| Deploy and manage Azure compute resources | 20–25% |
| Configure and manage virtual networking | 20–25% |
| Monitor and maintain Azure resources | 10–15% |
Azure Administrator expects you to know how Azure is actually managed.
You may see:
- Multiple-choice questions
- Drag-and-drop questions
- Hot-area questions
- Case studies
- Portal-based scenarios
- PowerShell or Azure CLI-style tasks
The hardest domain is usually Configure and manage virtual networking.
Common failure points include:
- VNet peering
- VPN Gateway SKUs
- NSG effective security rules
- Route tables
- Private endpoints
- Load balancers
- Application Gateway
- DNS integration
AZ-104 is closer to real admin work. You are not just choosing a service; you are often expected to know how to configure or troubleshoot it.
Which exam is harder?
Different kind of hard.
AWS SAA-C03 is harder to reason through
The question stems are longer.
The distractors are more plausible.
The right answer is often one of several valid answers, but it happens to be the most secure, most resilient, or most cost-effective for that situation.
You are doing architecture judgment under time pressure.
AZ-104 is harder to memorize
AZ-104 has more granular service knowledge.
You need to recognize commands, portal paths, configuration details, and administrative behavior.
It is less abstract than SAA, but more detail-heavy.
So the real answer is:
- If you are good at reasoning through scenarios, SAA may feel manageable.
- If you are good at hands-on configuration and memorization, AZ-104 may feel manageable.
- If you have never worked in either cloud, both will feel harder than the vendors suggest.
Prep time: real numbers, not vendor optimism
AWS and Microsoft often imply that these exams can be prepared for quickly.
That may be true if you already work with the platform.
For someone starting from scratch, the realistic numbers are higher.
| Situation | Realistic prep time |
|---|---|
| SAA if you already know AWS | 4–6 weeks at 10 hrs/week |
| SAA from scratch | 8–12 weeks at 10 hrs/week |
| AZ-104 if you already know Azure | 3–5 weeks at 10 hrs/week |
| AZ-104 from scratch | 6–10 weeks at 10 hrs/week |
The gap exists because AZ-104 has a smaller, more defined surface area.
SAA covers a much broader AWS ecosystem. You are often choosing between services you may never have used deeply.
Which pays more in 2026?
Typical US base salary ranges:
AWS SAA-holder roles
| Role | Approx. base salary |
|---|---|
| Cloud Engineer | $115K |
| Solutions Architect | $140K |
| Senior Cloud Engineer | $165K |
AZ-104-holder roles
| Role | Approx. base salary |
|---|---|
| Azure Administrator | $100K |
| Cloud Engineer, Azure | $115K |
| Senior Azure Administrator | $135K |
Typical India salary ranges:
| Certification | Approx. range |
|---|---|
| AWS SAA | ₹18–35 LPA |
| Azure AZ-104 | ₹12–24 LPA |
The AWS salary band is generally higher, but this needs context.
The gap only matters if you are realistically competitive for both AWS and Azure roles.
If your current employer runs Azure, your local market is Azure-heavy, and your internal mobility depends on Microsoft cloud skills, then AZ-104 may be the smarter move.
Taking SAA just to chase a higher salary band may require switching companies, domains, cities, or even countries.
That is a much bigger decision than choosing a certification.
The order I would take them in 2026
If you are job-hunting
Take AWS SAA-C03 first.
It has a larger market, better global portability, and stronger recognition across cloud engineering and solution architecture roles.
If your employer runs Azure
Take AZ-104 first.
You will actually use it. A cert plus internal project experience is usually stronger than a cert plus a cold job hunt.
If you want both eventually
Take SAA first, then AZ-104.
SAA teaches broader cloud architecture reasoning. Once that mental model is built, AZ-104 becomes easier because you are mapping Azure services onto concepts you already understand.
What I used for practice
Full disclosure: I run a small cert-prep site called CertsRise.
When I was preparing, I built adaptive AI mock exams for both certifications because most static question banks do not recalibrate based on weak topics.
If you want to see the head-to-head domain breakdown, I have put it here:
We also publish per-cert study timelines where weeks are distributed proportionally to blueprint weights:
Non-affiliate resources I would also recommend:
AWS SAA-C03
- Adrian Cantrill’s video course — detailed and architecture-focused
- Stephane Maarek on Udemy — cheaper, concise, and solid for exam prep
Azure AZ-104
- John Savill on YouTube — free and excellent
- Microsoft Learn official paths — important for blueprint alignment
TL;DR
- Take SAA-C03 if you want maximum career optionality, higher pay potential, and global portability.
- Take AZ-104 if your current job runs Azure or you prefer hands-on admin-style exams.
- If you plan to do both, take SAA first.
- Plan for roughly 2× the vendor’s claimed prep time.
- Do not stack both exams in 3 months unless you already have strong cloud experience. Burnout is real.
If you are deciding between another pair — like AWS SAA vs GCP ACE or AWS SA Pro vs AZ-305 — let me know. I may write a follow-up.
Top comments (0)