Most AI tools in travel can answer questions. Very few can actually do the work.
A delayed flight.
A missed airport transfer.
A hotel overbooked at midnight.
A client changes destinations while already in transit.
These aren't customer support problems.
They're operations problems.
Yet much of today's AI conversation is still focused on building assistants that generate impressive responses instead of systems that execute reliable workflows.
After spending the last several months building autonomous travel agents, I've become convinced that we're asking AI the wrong question.
Instead of asking:
"Can AI answer this?"
we should be asking:
"Can AI own this process from start to finish?"
The Hidden Cost of Modern Travel Operations
Travel companies don't lose most of their time answering FAQs.
They lose it managing fragmented information.
A typical booking touches multiple systems:
- CRM
- Supplier confirmations
- Flight updates
- Hotel vouchers
- Transfer schedules
- Customer preferences
- Internal spreadsheets
The problem isn't lack of data.
It's that every piece of information lives somewhere different.
Humans become the integration layer.
That doesn't scale.
The Shift: From AI Assistants to AI Operators
Most AI assistants work like this:
Question
↓
Large Language Model
↓
Answer
Useful?
Absolutely.
Finished?
Not even close.
An AI operator looks different:
Booking received
↓
Verify traveler profile
↓
Check supplier confirmations
↓
Monitor flights
↓
Detect risks
↓
Notify operations
↓
Rebook if required
↓
Update CRM
↓
Learn from outcome
Notice something?
The user may never even talk to the AI.
The work simply gets done.
Memory Changes Everything
One capability I believe remains underrated is persistent operational memory.
Most AI forgets everything after the conversation ends.
Operations cannot.
Imagine an agent remembering that a traveler:
- always prefers aisle seats,
- avoids overnight layovers,
- celebrates anniversaries while travelling,
- requires vegetarian meals,
- usually books airport transfers after landing.
Now imagine it applying those preferences automatically across future bookings.
No prompts.
No repeated instructions.
Just accumulated operational knowledge.
That's where autonomous systems begin to create real value.
Building Hermes TravelOps
This idea led me to build Hermes TravelOps—an autonomous operations agent for travel businesses.
The goal wasn't another chatbot.
The goal was something that behaves more like an experienced operations coordinator.
An ideal operational agent should be able to:
- monitor bookings continuously,
- detect potential disruptions before customers notice,
- preserve organizational knowledge,
- coordinate multiple workflows,
- improve after every completed trip.
The interesting engineering challenge isn't generating text.
It's designing systems that remember, observe, decide, and execute safely.
The Hard Part Isn't AI
Ironically, the hardest part hasn't been prompting large language models.
It's engineering everything around them:
- state management,
- workflow orchestration,
- memory,
- event handling,
- recovery from failures,
- trust,
- human approval when needed.
The intelligence isn't a single model.
It's the architecture.
Where I Think Travel Tech Is Heading
Over the next few years, I expect travel companies to rely less on dashboards and more on autonomous operational systems.
Instead of logging into ten different platforms every morning, operations teams may simply review:
"Here's what happened overnight.
Here are the issues already resolved.
Here are the three decisions that still require human approval."
That changes the role of operations from reacting to supervising.
I'm Curious What Others Think
If you're building with AI or working in travel operations, I'd love your perspective.
A few questions to start the discussion:
Where do you see the biggest operational bottleneck today?
Would you trust an autonomous agent to handle customer bookings if every action were fully auditable?
What's the biggest challenge you've encountered when moving from AI demos to production systems?
I'm especially interested in hearing from engineers, travel operators, and founders building systems that go beyond chat.
The next generation of AI may not be the one that talks the best.
It may be the one that quietly gets the work done.
Top comments (0)