Remember when your terminal was just for git push and the occasional rage‑quit from vim?
Now it’s a launchpad for the world’s top LLMs: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and more letting you refactor code, draft docs, or fact‑check an RFC without leaving the shell.
So which AI CLI actually deserves that precious spot in your workflow?
Google’s new Gemini CLI touts a million‑token context window and live Google Search grounding, while OpenAI Codex CLI rides ChatGPT’s mature API and bustling plugin scene.
Let’s compare context limits, costs, privacy, and productivity‑boosting tricks so you can pick (or combine) the right tool and shave hours off your next sprint.
Why CLIs Matter in the Age of LLM Search
Large‑language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity increasingly shape how developers search, write, and debug code.
Command‑line interfaces (CLIs) put that power exactly where many of us live all day: the terminal. No window‑switching, no copy‑pasting tokens, and crucially, no accidental code leaks to random web tabs.
Some Highlights
1. Context Window: How Big Is Big Enough?
- Gemini CLI swallows entire monorepos (up to one million tokens) without chunking. If you work on massive, multi‑language projects or want to paste a whole CSV, you’ll feel the difference.
-
Codex CLI caps at 200 k tokens, still larger than most repos on GitHub—but you might need to scope prompts when diffing all of
node_modules.
2. Pricing & Quotas
- Google’s free tier (60 req/min, 1 000/day) makes Gemini CLI a zero‑risk playground for side projects.
- Codex CLI is open‑source, but every call hits your OpenAI API meter. Costs stay reasonable with o4‑mini pricing, yet bursty sessions add up.
3. Search Grounding vs. Local Sandboxing
- Gemini pipes real‑time Google Search snippets into prompts, handy for “what’s the latest RFC?” style questions.
- Codex focuses on local reasoning. Its Suggest → Auto Edit → Full Auto modes let you decide exactly when the agent can touch files or run shell commands.
4. Ecosystem Vibes
- Gemini shares brains with VS Code’s Gemini Code Assist; your terminal and IDE stay in sync.
- Codex integrates seamlessly with ChatGPT Plus/Pro and the wider o‑series API, so your terminal, notebook, and production back‑end can all leverage the same model family.
Pro‑Tips for Higher Productivity
1. Chain them: Start with Gemini CLI to explore a huge codebase, then pipe the narrowed subset to Codex CLI for precise refactors.
2. Cache wisely: For Codex, store intermediate diffs locally to avoid re‑sending large contexts (saves tokens = money).
3. Ground prompts: In Gemini CLI, prepend search: to force an up‑to‑date snippet when you suspect stale docs.
4. Automate approvals: Write Makefile wrappers that flip Codex from Suggest to Auto Edit once tests pass.
5. Measure: Track time‑to‑fix and token spend per task to decide which agent actually boosts ROI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I self‑host either CLI?
Both are open‑source under Apache 2.0, so yes, though Gemini’s backend still calls Google’s endpoints unless you swap in a Vertex AI key.Does Perplexity have a comparable CLI?
Not officially; most devs wire Perplexity’s API into generic shell scripts. Until an official release, Gemini and Codex remain the mature options.Which one cites sources automatically?
Gemini CLI will append inline Google Search citations when grounding is enabled. Codex CLI won’t fetch the web, so citations are up to you.
Final Words
Choosing between Gemini CLI and OpenAI Codex CLI isn’t an either‑or for many teams—it’s a question of when to use each. Start with the tool that aligns with your wallet and workflow, then keep the other ready for edge cases. Your future self (and your build server) will thank you, especially when you hire prompt engineers to scale those workflows.
Top comments (0)