User stories were built for humans. AI needs something fundamentally different.
And the gap between these two realities is creating a hidden crisis in software delivery that most organizations have not even diagnosed yet.
Having led enterprise transformations through many evolution cycles, I have seen this pattern before: new capabilities arrive, we force them into existing processes, then wonder why the promised productivity gains never materialize. With AI, this mistake is particularly costly because the technology amplifies whatever clarity or confusion you provide. Feed it ambiguity, get confusion at scale.
The User Story Problem
Traditional user stories work brilliantly for human developers who fill gaps with context, experience, and intuition. They understand that "display search results quickly" means sub-second response times. They infer security requirements, accessibility standards, and architectural constraints.
AI has none of this implicit knowledge. When you tell AI to "create a search feature that displays results quickly," it generates code with no pagination, no error handling, no security controls. The AI is doing exactly what you asked, with no ability to infer what you meant.
The industry is rapidly acknowledging that we need a new contract between humans and AI. GitHub has launched the spec kit and AWS has launched KIRO with an embbeded spec-driven workflow. Leading organizations are building their own specification-driven frameworks that transform vague intentions into executable specifications, with constraints, security and architectural guidelines. These are not external tools but custom libraries that live alongside code, versioned in the same repositories, evolving through parallel refinement by AI, product managers, architects, and engineers.
Requirements as Living Code
The most successful teams I work and collaboarate with have stopped treating requirements as documents that live in Jira or Confluence. They are building specification libraries that are as integral to their repositories as the code itself. These specifications are versioned, tested, and continuously refined through the same pull request process that governs code changes.
Imagine a repository where alongside your /src directory, you have /specs containing machine-readable requirements that AI consumes directly. Product managers submit pull requests to refine business logic. Architects review and enhance technical constraints. Engineers add implementation notes. AI continuously validates consistency and completeness. This is not future vision. This is happening now.
The New Language of AI Collaboration
The transformation from user stories to AI-ready specifications requires structured intent expression that your team owns and evolves:
Traditional: "As a customer, I want to filter search results by price range so I can find products within my budget."
Team-Owned Specification: A versioned spec file in your repo containing input schema, validation rules, edge case behaviors, performance constraints, integration contracts, and concrete examples. This specification becomes the single source of truth that AI references, tests validate against, and documentation generates from.
Teams are creating domain-specific specification languages tailored to their business. An e-commerce company might have product search patterns. A fintech might have transaction processing templates. These become organizational assets, refined over months, encoding institutional knowledge in forms both humans and AI can consume.
AI-Augmented Parallel Refinement
The breakthrough is not just AI helping with requirements but the parallel refinement process where multiple intelligences collaborate simultaneously. During a typical refinement cycle, AI agents scan for ambiguities and missing edge cases, product managers validate business intent and outcomes, architects ensure system coherence and patterns, and engineers verify implementation feasibility.
Organizations report discovering requirements they would have missed until production. The AI spots patterns across your entire specification library that humans would never connect. Architects ensure consistency with system-wide constraints. Product managers maintain strategic alignment. Engineers ground everything in implementation reality.
Specification Libraries as Organizational Assets
Forward-thinking teams are building reusable specification libraries that become more valuable than code libraries. These contain patterns for common features (authentication, search, checkout), constraints for compliance and security, design systems, architectural and technology definitions, integration contracts between services, and validation rules for data quality.
When starting a new feature, teams do not begin with blank user stories. They compose from proven specification patterns, customize for specific needs, and let AI generate implementation from validated specs. The specification library grows smarter with each iteration, encoding lessons from production issues, successful patterns from high-performing features, and refined constraints from security reviews. This literally reduces the development time from weeks to hours.
Product Management Transformed
Product managers may evolve from document writers to specification architects working directly in repositories in parallel with the engineers, designers and architects. They are learning to express intent in structured formats, collaborate through pull requests, and think in patterns rather than features.
Their value lies in three capabilities AI cannot replicate:
Strategic intent curation: Ensuring every specification traces to business outcomes while maintaining consistency across hundreds of interdependent features.
Parallel validation orchestration: Coordinating refinement between AI, architects, and engineers while maintaining velocity.
Pattern recognition: Identifying which specifications should become reusable patterns and which remain feature-specific.
The Playbook for Specification-Driven Development
Step 1. Build Your Specification Library
Create a /specs directory in your repositories. Define your team's specification schema covering inputs, outputs, constraints, and examples. Start with one domain and expand gradually. Version specifications alongside code. Measure reduction in clarification cycles.
Step 2. Implement Parallel Refinement
Establish workflows where specifications are refined simultaneously by AI (completeness checking), product (intent validation), architecture (system coherence), and engineering (feasibility review). Use pull requests for specification changes. Create automated validation pipelines.
Step 3. Develop Reusable Patterns
Extract common specifications into templates. Build domain-specific languages for your business. Create specification inheritance hierarchies. Document pattern usage and evolution. Track pattern reuse rates.
Step 4. Version Requirements with Code
Stop treating requirements as external artifacts. Include specifications in code reviews. Tag specification versions with releases. Build traceability from specs to implementation. Generate documentation from specifications.
Step 5. Measure Specification Maturity
Define maturity stages for specifications. Track progression through stages. Correlate maturity with delivery success. Identify patterns that accelerate maturation. Build feedback loops from production to specifications.
What to Start, Stop, Continue
For Executives
Start: Building specification libraries as organizational assets. Treating requirements as code requiring version control. Investing in parallel refinement workflows. Measuring specification maturity as leading indicator.
Stop: Keeping requirements in separate tools from code. Using story points for AI-assisted development. Treating specifications as one-time artifacts.
Continue: Emphasizing outcomes over features. Investing in product management evolution. Maintaining focus on customer value.
For Engineers
Start: Contributing to specification libraries. Reviewing specs in pull requests. Building domain-specific specification languages. Creating specification validation tools.
Stop: Accepting external requirements documents. Working from ambiguous stories. Treating specifications as PM-only responsibility.
Continue: Collaborating on intent architecture. Maintaining excellence standards. Building reusable patterns.
Strategic Takeaway
Organizations succeeding with AI have recognized that specifications are not documentation but executable artifacts that deserve the same rigor as code. They live in repositories, evolve through pull requests, and are refined in parallel by human and artificial intelligence.
The winners will be teams that build specification libraries encoding their unique business logic, accessible to both humans and AI. These become competitive moats: the better your specifications, the faster AI can help you build, the more you learn, the stronger your specifications become.
The future belongs to organizations that treat requirements as living code, refined in parallel by diverse intelligence, versioned with the same discipline as production systems. This is not about better documentation. It is about building a new development paradigm where human intent and machine execution merge seamlessly.
We are all learning this new language together and there is a lot of space to evolve and mature the practice.
Feel free to share what works for you and discuss your challenges
The best patterns will emerge from practitioners in the trenches, not from consultants in ivory towers.
Top comments (0)