DEV Community

crow
crow

Posted on

The Transparency Paradox: I Open-Sourced My Web3 Game's Contracts, But Kept The Backend Secret. Here's Why.

Game Banner

There's a moment of sheer terror that every Web3 founder faces. It's not the fear of a bug, a market crash, or an empty Discord. It's the moment you hover your mouse over the "Make Public" button on your source code repository.

For months, this code has been your secret. Your intellectual property. Your competitive edge. Making it public feels like you're not just opening the door to your house; you're handing out the blueprints and a set of keys.

Today, I did just that for my on-chain game, Musical Chairs. The smart contracts that govern the game, hold the funds, and define the rules are now fully open source. But the backend code that runs the game logic remains proprietary.

This isn't a compromise. It's a strategy. And it's at the very heart of the Web3 paradox: how to build a transparent, trustless system without giving away the kingdom.

The Web3 Promise: Trust, Don't Verify? No, Trust Because You Can Verify.

In the world of Web2, the "secret sauce" is everything. In Web3, the secret sauce is that there is no secret sauce on-chain. The core value proposition of our entire industry is that users don't have to trust a person or a company; they can trust the code.

But they can only trust the code if they can see it.

A closed-source smart contract handling user funds is a massive red flag. It asks for blind faith in a space designed to eliminate it. That's why, as a foundational step, I've open-sourced all the smart contracts for Musical Chairs under the MIT license.

➡️ You can view them all here: github.com/crow-004/musical-chairs-contracts

This means anyone can now verify that our game does exactly what it says on the tin. No backdoors. No hidden fees. No "rug-pull" functions. Just code.

The Fear is Real: "But What About the Hackers?"

The first thought that paralyzes any developer is: "By showing everyone the locks, am I just giving hackers the keys?"

It's a valid fear. But the concept of "security through obscurity" is a myth that has been debunked time and time again. A determined attacker can decompile your bytecode. Hiding your source code only stops the good guys from helping you.

I learned this firsthand. A few days ago, a white-hat hacker named Harun reached out. He had found a vulnerability—not in the contract, but in the domain's DNS configuration, which could have allowed for email spoofing and sophisticated phishing attacks. He didn't exploit it; he reported it responsibly. We fixed it and rewarded him for his efforts.

This is the power of "many good eyes" over the "one bad actor." By opening the code, you aren't just inviting scrutiny; you are inviting a global, decentralized security team to help you build a stronger fortress.

A Developer's Guide to Provable Code

Opening your code is step one. Step two is proving that the open-source code is the exact code running on the blockchain. This is where many developers stumble.

The key lies in a humble file your compiler generates: metadata.json.

Think of this file as your contract's "digital passport." It contains the compiler version, settings, and hashes of all your source files. When you upload this file and your source code to a service like Sourcify, it can recompile your code and verify, with cryptographic certainty, that it produces the exact same bytecode that's on-chain. This is the ultimate "social proof" in our industry—or more accurately, verifiable proof.

If you're using Hardhat, extracting this metadata is simple. You can create a small task like this:

// file: hardhat.config.ts

import { task } from "hardhat/config";
import * as fs from "fs";
import * as path from "path";

task("export-metadata", "Exports the metadata file for a contract")
  .addParam("contract", "The fully qualified name of the contract (e.g., 'contracts/MyContract.sol:MyContract')")
  .setAction(async (taskArgs, hre) => {
    const buildInfo = await hre.artifacts.getBuildInfo(taskArgs.contract);
    if (buildInfo) {
      const [sourceName, contractName] = taskArgs.contract.split(":");
      const metadata = buildInfo.output.contracts[sourceName]?.[contractName]?.metadata;
      if (metadata) {
        fs.writeFileSync('metadata.json', metadata);
        console.log("✅ Metadata exported!");
      }
    }
  });
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Running npx hardhat export-metadata --contract "contracts/MusicalChairs.sol:MusicalChairsGame" gives you the exact file you need. This small step is what separates "source-available" from "source-verified."

The Strategy: The "Transparent Core" Model

So, if transparency is so important, why isn't the backend code public?

Because my goal is to build a sustainable business, not just a weekend project. The smart contracts are the "Transparent Core." They are the public constitution, the immutable laws of the game that protect the user.

The backend, however, is the "Proprietary Engine." It contains the unique logic for player matchmaking, real-time communication, anti-bot measures, and performance optimizations. This is our competitive advantage. Open-sourcing it at this early stage would be like a Formula 1 team publishing the blueprints to their engine mid-season. A larger, better-funded team could simply copy it and out-market us into oblivion.

This hybrid approach provides the best of both worlds: on-chain trust and off-chain competitive advantage.

The Road Ahead: Audits and Accountability

My commitment to transparency doesn't stop here. This is a journey, and we're #buildinginpublic.

While the backend code will remain closed for now, I want to provide assurances of its integrity. That's why, once the game starts generating meaningful revenue, the very first investment will be a professional, third-party audit of the backend code by a reputable cybersecurity firm. The goal will be to get a public report confirming that the server-side logic is fair, secure, and contains no malicious functions.

This is how you build a real business in Web3. Not by hiding, but by layering proofs of integrity, one on top of the other.

This journey is terrifying, exhilarating, and deeply rewarding. If you're a developer on the fence about opening your code, I hope my story helps. It's not about giving everything away. It's about building trust in a trustless world. And that, ultimately, is the most valuable asset you can have.

Top comments (0)